Methodist Financial

February 13, 2020

United Methodist Financial Decline

United Methodism is increasingly likely to divide into separate traditional and liberal denominations. But even absent this division, the church was already heading towards sharp drops in funding for denominational structures, reflecting United Methodism’s ongoing drop in membership and resources. A recent memo from the General Council on Finance and Administration (GCFA) outlined this reality.

GCFA is submitting to General Conference 2020 a quadrennial budget for United Methodism’s structures of $494 million, an 18% reduction from the 2017-2020 budget. These cuts include 35% for United Methodist Communications (UMCOM), 20% for General Board of Global Ministries (GBGM) and General Board of Church and Society (GBCS), 20% for General Board of Higher Education, 15.5% for Discipleship Ministries (DM), 30% for Central Conference (overseas) Theological Education Fund, .5% for Commissions on the Status and Role of Women and Religion and Race, plus 87% for  Interdenominational Fund, which contributes to National and World Councils of Churches.

Although not specifically in this GCFA memo, there’s a 33% proposed drop in funding for United Methodism’s 13 official seminaries. Another church documents admits this drop “should spur a needed conversation about whether or not we can continue to support 13 seminaries and all of our current licensing schools given declining resources.”

The GCFA memo notes that any denominational division will entail additional proportionate reductions. If 20% of USA membership joins a new traditional Methodist denomination, there would be a 20% decline for denominational structures, or an additional $99 million. Every one percent drop in membership potentially means a $5 million quadrennial drop in funding for the denomination.

I believe that at least 2 million USA United Methodists will join a new traditional denomination. Every year United Methodism loses nearly 100,000 members in the USA. During the chaos of the division, this decline will at least double, meaning at least 800,000 likely quite Methodism altogether over the next four years. These combined loses could equal or surpass over 40% of United Methodism’s current 6.7 million USA members. So by 2024 United Methodism’s national bureaucracy could face funding cuts of 60%.

GCFA notes that the proposed Protocol for division calls for United Methodism to pay $25 million to a new traditional denomination, and potentially $2 million to a new progressive denomination. Since GCFA’s proposed budget entails no cuts for the bishops and Africa University, among other projects, the cumulative cut for remaining church structures could be as much as $241 (49%) reduction, assuming a 20% membership drop. A 40% membership drop could ultimately entail a 70% funding drop for denominational structures.

Amid sharp budget cuts for United Methodist agencies, GCFA suggests bureaucratic consolidation,  noting church agencies are currently in 5 cities and 10 separate buildings. Sale of some buildings and moving away from downtown “would realize a significant influx of cash” and “reduce overall cost of operation.” It also notes that their proposed budget sets $154 million (31% of total budget) for educational ministries and wonders if a “smaller denomination” should reduce this support.

GCFA notes that proposed funding for bishops in 2021-2024 is $98 million (20% of current proposed budget), up from $92 million (15% of the budget) in 2017-2020. If United Methodism loses 20% of membership, the Episcopal Fund then accounts for 25% of total proposed budget.  It says current quadrennial costs for each USA bishop is $1.4 million in 46 Episcopal areas. Each of 5 USA jurisdictions is entitled to at least 5 bishops.  Reducing that minimum by 1, or 5 bishops, would save $7 million per quadrennium.  Europe has 4 bishops, each of which costs $1.5. African bishops, of whom there are currently 13 with 5 new Episcopal areas planned, cost $800,000 each. There are 3 Filipino bishops, each costing $800,000.

Salaries and benefits for bishops including retirees are $56 million per quadrennium, office support is $21 million, travel and other support is $5 million. Support for the Council of Bishops is $11 million per quadrennium, with their meetings costing $5 million.

Regarding the $25 million proposed for payment to a new traditional Methodist church and possibly $2 million for new progressive denomination, GCFA suggested these funds could come from increasing apportionments on local churches. Or they could come from reducing payments to church agencies, which would reduce their already scheduled reductions by an additional 7%. It also noted there’s real estate income from buildings owned by church agencies.

My prediction is that GCFA likely underestimates the sharp drop in funding for United Methodist structures over the next four years, with dramatic consequences for the United Methodist bureaucracy.


78 Responses to United Methodist Financial Decline

  1. CBByrd says:

    Many who still participate in local UMC churches have designated gifts so that they can only be used for local church needs and missions and education activities approved by the local congregation. A couple of years of that, as some have been doing, is having an impact, it appears.

    • Jim says:

      Yes, that’s what my wife & I do – designate our giving either to the local church’s music program, pastor’s discretionary fund or one of several memorial funds that are controlled by the church trustees.

      We’re done with the UMC bishops and agencies.

      • Elaine says:

        Am I reading this correctly, the cost of each bishop is $350,000 annually in the US? Does this amount reflect the salary and benefit package or are administrative expenses, eg travel, lodging, etc included in that budget item?

        • Steven-SD says:

          We see a lot of line items in the budget with arguable dollar amounts for salaries, education and missions. What we don’t see are meaningful information on what is being accomplished with all of these resources along with language that shows the goal connection to vibrant and effective results (conversions, significant Spiritual experiences, Faith in Action ministries, etc.). If we had more emphasis on our Faith Relationship with God, I believe that we’d have less controversy over the legalistic arguments that are dividing the church. Effective missions and defined missions that we can empathize and approach with genuine passion, would change our conversations! Peace comes from focusing on the Presence of God in our decision making. Although we reference our connection in obscure theology, it appears that more churches are operating in a humanistic manner instead of a true reference point of Faith. When is the last time a message or activity truly fed your Spirit and motivated you to action that you were genuinely excited? Investing in buildings and programs that are void of a Living Faith defeat the created purpose of a Living Church over dead religion and ritualistic denominationalism.

      • Irene says:

        I tried designating my contributions to the Memorial Fund, only to find out that it was being tapped to use on shortfalls in the general budget. I know the financial committee also redirects money from the organ fund. I’ll have to find a new strategy for this year.

  2. the gentle truth says:

    quite/quit

  3. A.J. Bernard says:

    A drop in seminary funding means increased tuition costs passed on to the student. My first year at a United Methodist seminary was $20,000, and I had 3 more years to go. I left because I was going to spend $80,000 to get a $30k a year job. It didn’t make sense.

    • Steve says:

      That’s nothing compared to other professional schools, like law, medical or engineering. Many people go through seminary with no intention of ever serving as clergy, going into some other sjw profession instead. A church that can only afford to pay $30k a year to clergy probably needs to be closed or consolidated.

      • JR says:

        “Many people go through seminary with no intention of ever serving as clergy, going into some other sjw profession instead.”

        I wonder what IRD pays.
        https://juicyecumenism.com/author/lomperianreview/

        • Steve says:

          Inigo Montoya: Who are you?
          Westley: No one of consequence.
          Inigo Montoya: I must know.
          Westley: Get used to disappointment.
          Inigo Montoya: Kay.

      • Scott says:

        30k a year is almost below 3/4 time. That’s why we need so many locals now. My AC is licensing 2or3 locals to every elder. Sometimes more. At 30 k a church is better off dropping just below 3/4 time and not have to pay health insurance costs. Many of our elders are overeducated, over loaded with debt, and live in a world isolated from that of the laity. They are required to spend more time in meetings etc than in ministry while their church declines. Locals are often much closer to the congregation in personality, theology and more connected to the community. By the time an elder really connects to a congregation and the community they are moved. Itineracy is only useful when your stuck with a minister who is a bad fit. What worked in 1800 is counterproductive today.

      • Rich says:

        A quick internet search says average first year engineer salaries in US are about $90k, MDs range from $130-$300k+, and JDs start about $140k. $30k isn’t even close. My AC will literally take anyone they can as a local. No wonder the church is sucking wind right now. Do you honestly expect to attract the best and brightest people by paying so little for a degree that takes 4 years? Not rationally. These ACs must want a lot of local pastors. I wonder why? Who benefits by having (in business speak) many franchised locations paying high franchise fees (apportionments) staffed by low paid managers who have little to no upward mobility or income potential thus guaranteeing high turnover? Only those intent on keeping the current status quo. Why is there no leadership development in the UMC? Where are the incentives to do excel?

      • Rich says:

        A quick internet search says average first year engineer salaries in US are about $90k, MDs range from $130-$300k+, and JDs start about $140k. $30k isn’t even close. My AC will literally take anyone they can as a local. No wonder the church is sucking wind right now. Do you honestly expect to attract the best and brightest people by paying so little for a degree that takes 4 years? Not rationally. These ACs must want a lot of local pastors. I wonder why? Who benefits by having (in business speak) many franchised locations paying high franchise fees (apportionments) staffed by low paid managers who have little to no upward mobility or income potential thus guaranteeing high turnover? Only those intent on keeping the current status quo. Why is there no leadership development in the UMC? Where are the incentives to excel?

        • Steve says:

          “For all private-sector law firms, the median starting salary in 2016 was $68,375 according to an annual survey from US News & World Report” https://work.chron.com/average-starting-salary-law-school-students-7716.html. Presumably that only includes people that were able to find work; many can’t. “According to the National Association for Law Placement (NALP), only 63% of law graduates from the class of 2015 obtained full time, bar passage required employment.” Glassdoor says the average Methodist pastor salary ranges from $25k to $67k. Like I previously said, I do think a church that pays only $30k needs to be closed or merged; presumably the remaining merged churches could pay more. That’s what other denominations are trying to do. Another thing other denominations are experimenting with in underserved areas: lay clergy (clergy without seminary degrees). Or, have one person serve several churches. I don’t envy you having to make career choices given what college costs these days, but seminary is already cheaper than most other higher education.

        • Tad says:

          The avg starting salaries for engineers is not $90k. It’s more in the range of $55-$65. An occasional employer may pay more, but they are few and far between.

          • Average engineer salaries (starting and experienced) are higher in certain areas, based on cost of living, and also varied based on discipline.  Here in North Texas, a starting mechanical engineer would not command a $90K salary, but on the coasts, a starting electrical or chemical engineer might command a six-figure starting salary.

    • Brad Barringer says:

      Sounds like you weren’t called.

      • Tony says:

        Many are called but few are chosen!

        • K.G. Goodwright says:

          I’m reading the threads on salary and upward mobility issues and I’m thinking about the early church. Why would a person go into the ministry for the salary and the upward mobility in the first place? Isn’t it a calling? My husband pastors a small church. He takes no salary and has no benefits. He works full time as a Chemist. My Dad was a pastor for 50+ years and made $75/week sometimes with six kids. That does not negate the responsibility of the church to take care of its pastors but I would want my Pastor to be called by God and to be a person of great faith.

    • Brad says:

      Sounds like you rung your own number rather than being called. Just looking for an easy job

  4. John W Marsh says:

    Very important issue. Locally I see many Methodists of all stripes jumping ship to go to other denominations or none at all. A few may show up to “visit” twice a year at Easter and Christmas but their dollars are no coming back.

  5. John Harper says:

    Consequences of the overall decline . sadly the good we as a body is being hurt by this division and decline !

  6. Steve says:

    Surprised that the organization has so much money at its disposal. Breeding ground for waste and corruption.

  7. Dan says:

    In my experience the more “orthodox” members tend to be the largest givers, so the decline in giving to the remaining UMC after the split may be more precipitous than expected.

    • Bob says:

      I agree . The progressive movement is going to go bankrupt not too long after the split.

      • binkyxz3 says:

        Not so fast. The LGBTQ crowd will continue to claim victimhood in perpetuity. It all depends on how clean a break the traditionalists can get. There is evil at work here.

  8. Tim says:

    My local rural Methodist church 10 years ago averaged well over 200 in attendance each Sunday. (Early 1970’s over 350 each Sunday and Easter would have close to 600.) Five years ago we averaged 170. Today we average about 120. (Easter we had a little over 200.) Death, issues with leadership from the past three Pastors, same gender national issues within the Methodist Church and the fall out is going to be even greater, no matter which way the vote goes in May, on our local church as you listen to people talk about what they are going to do.

    • Walter R Pryor says:

      This debate has been going on since the late 1980s. It is too bad the church leaders did not say no to the LGBT movement.
      If the leaders had just said no the Methodist Denomination would still be growing and growing.
      It is insightful and ironic that even the secular population understands that God is Holy and does not compromise His Holiness for Love.
      The human brain is not very stable and easily deceived by Satan.

  9. td says:

    These are true signs of a religious institution that has both failed to pass on the faith to future generations and failed to create new believers by spreading the gospel.

    Truly the umc is a church that has little faith in God and does not value church as a community of believers.

    • Barry says:

      You are so correct. Not only the UMC has failed this but most other protestant denominations as well. We have also failed at raising ethical Christian leaders as well. This has a direct impact on the shape the country is in. We are in a mess at many levels.

    • Paul York says:

      Your first paragraph says it all. This is the root cause of the failure of the UMC.

  10. William says:

    My, my — they’ve been telling us poor suckers that our tithes and offerings, those not supporting the local church, were going on up the line to MISSIONS. Goodness, this new Traditional Methodist Church is looking better and better by the day. They’re going to cut apportionments of the local church by two-thirds while this restructured Post Separation UMC will certainly have to increase them substantially – and after liquidation of available properties, continue increasing them.

  11. Cynthia Clark says:

    The twisted church hierarchy FOR YEARS has been making a conscious practice of uprooting well-loved clergy from small towns and cities and replacing them with gays, lesbians, ultra liberals, blacks and others who only disrupt, lecture, condescend and practice division. One removed all American flags from our church in Webb City, Mississippi, even the flag owned by our scout troops. This single, black, bitter lesbian (a single mother) scrapped the traditional hymns and made the congregation sing ‘We shall Overcome’ after lecturing how evil and racist we whites were. The church lost half its membership by the time we forced her out. She was NOT a Christian and told us there were many gods and messiahs. She was true evil yet the United Methodist Church FORCED this demon on us knowing it would destroy our Church! We left the church and learned that this was happening all over the country.

    • Tony says:

      Perfect illustration of the root of the majority of issues in the UMC today! All of which can be laid at the feet of the majority of Liberal Bishops who have fallen way short of their responsibility to honor Christ and the Church!

      • William says:

        Just think, in a secular setting, the majority of these bishops would have been fired years ago. But, the UMC signs them on for life to do as they please — never mind any promises they made. Fast forward, they have destroyed the church and ushered in full schism.

      • Tamara says:

        This is so true!

    • Dr. Charles Klink says:

      I know what you mean. My second appointment was to a liberal radical church…and I am not a liberal, but they (the cabinet) wanted a pastor that they said “had the ego-strength to survive” (what they told me years later) and the man I followed to that church was a radical liberal whose first move was to remove the flags. He was there for 5 years and the congregation lost 80% of their attendance (not membership… ATTENDANCE!). Many came back while I was there (4 yrs.) but the damage was done. Church never recovered…pastoral leadership is now less-than-fulltime and average attendance is at 20. But the liberal message was preserved as the pastor before me was reappointed until retirement and is now receiving pension and rarely comes to Annual Conference and enjoying life while his ministry devastated congregations for 40 years+ …and this is just one example of many congregations across our system. Does the system care? It will within the next decade!

      • td says:

        Our UMC “system” believes church is dead because it is outdated. Which pretty much sums up how they feel about the gospel and the idea of god as well.

        You have to understand that this pastor believed he was liberating his congregations from the oppression. Therefore it makes sense that decline = success.

  12. Cynthia Clark says:

    Sorry. Autocorrect. It was Webb City Missouri, not Webb City, Mississippi.

    • Mike Pinner says:

      Cynthia, this has been happening all over the southeastern jurisdiction for years. Right here in East Tennessee, we have been forced to accept and pay some of the sorriest human beings, political activists, SJW’s, and corrupt, money-grabbing excuses for ministers. Some of these men actually steal from their own churches- money, building supplies, equipment, computers, etc. It is appalling. I’ve seen it myself.

  13. Steven J. Soller says:

    One of these things is a LOT less than the others: “These cuts include… .5% for Commissions on the Status and Role of Women and Religion and Race…” Literally, the UMC is more interested in Social Justice than Discipleship…and a lot more interested than in the Central Conference. Way to prioritize, UMC. Glad none of my tithe goes to you anymore as my wife and I are part of the 100k that quit the UMC in 2019.

  14. Lisa says:

    Neither side will survive in the long run.

    • Larry Collins says:

      That has not proven true in the Presbyterian and Episcopal split. The conservative PCUSA is growing and so is the Anglican where conservative Episcopalians went. People are hungry for the true Word. Where it is preached the churches grow. “If I be lifted up I will draw everyone unto myself,”- Jesus

      • David Gingrich says:

        Larry, you are correct, But is the orthodox PCA that is growing and the liberal PCUSA that is shrinking.

        P.S. Mark said: “My prediction is that GCFA likely underestimates the sharp drop in funding for United Methodist structures over the next four years, with dramatic consequences for the United Methodist bureaucracy.” I agree wholeheartedly. Orthodox Methodists have been financing the UMC. The “progressive” UMC will implode IMO.

        • Laura says:

          My family just left the Methodist church for a conservative PCA Presbyterian church and we love it. It’s the first time in years we’ve heard a serious challenging sermon.

      • The theologically liberal Presbyterian Church (USA) is hemorrhaging about 60K members per year, whereas the theologically orthodox Presbyterian Church in America has seen modest gains most years in the past decade, although the theologically orthodox Evangelical Presbyterian Church has seen slight declines the pas few years.

        There is a serious issue in Evangelical churches, in which personal evangelism is no longer happening, as it once did. As Tim Keller observed a few years ago (https://byfaithonline.com/four-questions-worth-exploring/), Evangelical lay Christians are increasingly being confronted with certain hard questions which they have not been equipped to answer.  It is not as if satisfying answers to these questions do not exist, but the Evangelical Church is, frankly, not doing a good enough job to equip their members to counter the secular, post-Christian metanarrative, which has co-opted certain Christian teachings (e.g., care and concern for the poor) but has established a thoroughly alien approach to human sexuality that makes Biblical teaching on the subject seem out-of-date and irrelevant.

  15. The reality is that if 20% of the current membership moves to the Traditional Methodist Church they are likely to account for 40% of the current dollars in the church.

  16. Roger says:

    A Financial Advisor for Churches, regardless of denomination, about 15 years ago, said that Churches losing members over 60 years old, that it took 4 younger people to replace their giving to the Church. It appears that the coming Church breakup, will not be able to sustain itself. Many small Churches, of any denomination smaller than 130 each Sunday, has a hard time paying a full time Pastor without them having a second income to supplement it. It appears that the Large Church Organization will be out, except a few, and small churches will go Independent.

  17. Sonja Marie LeVan says:

    I know the WCA has written a new discipline and is set to go with a new denomination…..not sure it will have Methodist in the name….sad to say…I am 73 was baptised a Methodist at 10….I do not want to see “evangelical” attached to the name because of the evangelicals supporting a no Christian “trump”

    • td says:

      You pinpoint a major issue which leaders from all sides have failed to publicly admit: most local umc churches will not choose based on theology but will choose based on culture and worship style.

      There are large areas of the umc that are traditional in belief, but will be adverse to choosing an organization titled evangelical. They will also be hesitant to align with a group that they see might impose charismatic and praise band worship styles.

      I appreciate that the wca has not included evangelical in their name, but false information is rampant and i fear that in most annual conferences the traditional believers are already labeled as racists, homohobes, and sexists- and their leaders will come and impose their holy roller style on you if you join up with them.

    • William says:

      Let it assume the natural, already recognizable, understandable name already being used to describe this emerging denomination — The Traditional Methodist Church.

      • td says:

        My guess is that they will want each church to brand itself- like the megachurches are already doing- and then just have an affiliation that isn’t really “branding”. I’m not sure i agree with that approach, but i think most of the powerful churches in the traditional denomination will want to do their own thing.

        I would think that good affiliation names are along the lines of “Wesley Methodist Church”, “Covenant Methodist Church”.

        But we have to acknowledge that most of the big movers in the wca view evangelical as their identity, so something like “Methodist Evangelical Church” would be on their minds- especially since that ties in with the historic name of Methodist Episcopal Church. If they listed evangelical behind methodist i think that would probably limit the negative impact that the word may have in the north and midwest

  18. Cindy Andrews says:

    I grew up in a small Church, so special to me. I was saved in that Church, baptized, Sunday School teacher, pianoist, Youth leader, etc. In the 1970’s when abortion was the main topic, a lot of UM believed the church was headed in the wrong direction; I was one of them. The UMC is not God. Be His. Don’t let sentimentality rule you. But, you have to do what your heart leads you to do. All of this is so very sad. So sad. And what is happening to the UMC is also happening to our Country – being torn down, a little at a time, until one day we won’t recognize it. I fear what my grandchildren and great-grandchildren will have to face. Oh Lord, help us.

  19. Paul C Prose Jr says:

    I think that money is wasted in the bureaucracy, so I prefer to send more to the Florida United Methodist Children’s Home. We should give those children the best lives that we can.

  20. Bob says:

    We gave very generously (beyond normal tithe) at the UMC we attended for years. When we finally had our eyes opened to what was going on, we left (along with most of the conservatives, and yes, there went the large share of the income). Hate to say it, but the scars from that experience have affected the way we give now, even though we are currently satisfied with the conservative church we are attending. We’re wary of building up another church and watching it succumb to societal pressure. So we give (generously), but only some to the church. We choose other worthy Christian and non-Christian organizations – all of whom mirror our values. And we are choosing not to leave money to the church in our wills – same reason.

    • Larry Collins says:

      I’m sorry you had a terrible experience at a church you supported so well. I would challenge you to rethink your current giving pattern. There are many fine para-church and other non-profit organizations. But there is only one church of Jesus Christ. If your current church is where your feet are and you approve of the programs, they deserve your full support.

  21. Polly says:

    I left the Methodist church when I saw how our new preacher handled people and money. He should have never been a preacher. The very holy church within a church, Walk to Emmaeus, never stood up to him. They were the church leaders. Finally after nearly breaking the church, he was voted out. No more Methodist bureaucracies for me.

    • Chuck says:

      The preacher shouldn’t be handling the money, except his own. The money is handled by the trustees, finance committee, treasurer and the financial secretary. The pastor, regardless of how good or bad he is in that position, has nothing to do with it. Maybe as a co-signer on checks. Definitely the way it is and always has been at my local church.

  22. Andrea says:

    Self-inflicted demise.

  23. Donald says:

    Didn’t the American delegates to that Global Convention threaten the African delegates they would stop funding African missions if they didn’t vote for the Progressive plan? I believe the Africans told them they could keep their money…and may have also said something to the American delegates about a door. But I can’t recall the exact quote.

  24. John Smith says:

    My UMC church actually pays its apportionments so until this mess sorts out I’ve designated my tithe to specific local missions in the church. If we go WCA, which is not certain, I wonder if they will be more accountable of if I’ll have to continue the practice.

    • Bob says:

      I would encourage you to look into the accessibility of your “designated” funds for other purposes. Before our departure from the UMC, we went the “designated” route, as you are doing. Then we learned that, given certain conditions – or by vote of the Admin. Council (or some group given the power to do so), designated funds could be appropriated for things other than those for which the givers designated them.

      • John Smith says:

        Yes, I know that the funds can be redirected at the discretion of the appropriate committees, leaders, etc. Most people never read the BOD or articles which is why many an Elder, when wanting to do something lacking support loves to say “In the BOD….” That is why I pick ones unlikely to be interfered with.

  25. JIm says:

    About ten years ago I began teaching an adult class in a local UMC church. We gave up the denominational literature and began using only the Bible. The class has grown from 10 to over 125. If our church was to follow the more liberal line, I’m sure these adults who are grounded in Scripture would leave the church and the budget would lose most of its tithers. Many of these are already e to designate giving to local missions.

  26. Lizzie Warren says:

    I was financial Secretary of another denomination for five years.

    The conservative members of the congregation contributed the vast majority of offereings. Literally, widows on a modest fixed income gave more in raw dollars than the wealthy professionals who attended.

    I struggled hearing members assuming the wealthy were the biggest contributors. I kept the confidence but it was an enlightening experience.

    • mountaingirl says:

      I’m a UMC pastor’s wife (retired), whose husband refused to ever have anything to do with the finances — all done by Trustees or the Finance Committee along with church treasurer. However, they did give him feedback about the trends of the congregation’s giving. After 40 years of ministry, I can assure you that in most UMC’s, it seems the bulk of the giving is consistently done by biblical conservatives, and often the most “raw dollars” are given by those who are the least wealthy.

  27. Michael says:

    Annual polls demonstrate that conservative Christians, especially Southerners, are much more generous in charitable giving than other subsets – and the generosity goes well beyond generous giving for their churches’ internal needs. One of our conventional Methodist ministers sat, on an airline trip, next to another Methodist minister, whose budget doubled ours. They agreed that the difference was the degree to which Jesus was preached. People contribute – apparently and logically – less to “needs” than excitement about the Gospel. The continuing, but revised, standard denomination that lies ahead will, over time, suffer from both membership and financial loss, which will be exacerbated when they learn that the denomination’s emphasis (inevitably) is less on discipleship and evangelism than social justice, internal and external. We, stoked by our too-powerful clergy and administrative careerists, are forfeiting our denomination’s earlier respect as a powerhouse for propagating the Gospel.

  28. Pat says:

    What the local Methodist church decides to do will determine the real future of the traditional or progressive Methodist church if the protocol passes at the May convention. I was raised Methodist, saved in a Nazarene church, led to a Baptist church for over 20+ years when there was no Nazarene church available and then back to the Methodist church where the Bible is preached and believed! The Lord will lead us to a new church if necessary or our current Methodist church will remain traditional after the separation. As long as our local church is traditional with a full believe in what our Bible says regarding all things, then I hope to remain a Methodist. If a liberal pastor is assigned then those of us, as so called traditionalists, will leave and find a new church home. The General Conference should be interesting in May. But, the power brokers probably already have it worked out.

    • William says:

      Oh goodness no, your local Methodist church will not remain traditional after separation. It would be part of the restructured Post Separation UMC that will liberalize its sexual ethics, marriage definition to include same-sex marriage, and liberalize its sexual standards for ordination. For your local church to remain traditional, it will have to join the new Traditional Methodist Denomination that will emerge.

  29. Paul Rudolph says:

    I have already stopped contributing to our church. It has voted against the “traditional plan” that had been suggested. I have asked our pastor at least three times that, if the Bible is the inspired word of God, as she once told me, does it mean that 1 Corinthians 6:9 is true and to be believed? I cannot get an answer from her. It is time to leave, I think.

  30. One Trick Pony says:

    To see where the UMC is headed, one need only look to the fate of the Boy Scouts of America.

    • Linda Cebrian says:

      Exactly. This is what happens when the Great Commission is abandoned in favor of “inclusion.”
      (And as far as homoerotic activism is concerned, this is their modus operandi – infiltrate to change an institution to their viewpoint or destroy it from within.)

  31. Howard says:

    With the new crisis of Covid 19, local churches must become the priority. Rural churches are hurting. With support of REAL evangelism and discipleship world wide. It is time that the people who have led us into the denominational crisis be held accountable. Bishops, boards and agencies need HUGH bloated budget, salary and staff cuts.

  32. Randy says:

    Mark says “My prediction is that GCFA likely underestimates the sharp drop in funding for United Methodist structures over the next four years, with dramatic consequences for the United Methodist bureaucracy.” This was before COVID…giving trends now are being impacted by fear, unemployment, business closure, stock portfolio losses, etc. Post COVID there may not be much left of the various UMC institutions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *