The Non-Christian Overculture and the Stockholm Syndrome

on October 31, 2025

John West, Vice President and Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Washington, spoke at the Southern Evangelical Seminary National Apologetics Conference in Rock Hill, South Carolina on October 10 regarding the massive change in mores regarding sex and marriage and corresponding changes in public stances and framing on the part of Evangelical leaders.

West’s new book, Stockholm Syndrome Christianity, describes how many contemporary Christian leaders assume the framing, attitudes, and positions of the wider secular culture that are in fact hostile to Christian teaching. The term “Stockholm Syndrome” refers to a bank robbery in Stockholm, Sweden in which hostages bonded with their captors, rather than with authorities and law enforcement. It now refers to any situation in which captives bond with their captors rather than the people from whom they were taken.

A New Hostile Environment for Biblical Teachings

The backdrop of the leadership change is a dramatic change in beliefs and attitudes on the part of the wider secular culture regarding sex and marriage. He said that a substantial majority of Americans (68 percent) believe “that sexual intercourse between an unmarried man and woman is morally acceptable,”  Seventy-five percent believe that divorce is acceptable, 67 percent “think that having a baby outside of marriage is moral … these views represent a sea change in American public opinion … as recently as 2001 only half of Americans thought that sex outside of marriage was moral (53 percent), and less than five in ten thought that having babies outside of wedlock was acceptable.” Similarly, acceptance of divorce in 2001 was 16 points less than in 2025.  Yet another “massive shift” is acceptance of same-sex marriage, which is now nearly 70 percent, versus “less than a third” in 1996. LGBT identification has exploded, with 21 percent of Generation Z so identifying in 2022, while the figure is nearly 40% at “certain liberal arts colleges.” By contrast, 20 years ago, only 3.5% of American adults identified as LGBT. There are today about 18 million cohabiting couples and 11 million single parent households. In some states, as many as 55% of children are born outside of marriage, more than 1 million unborn children are killed by abortion, and there are roughly 700,000 divorces each year.

The population of self-identified Christians is markedly affected by this, with half of such persons believing that “casual sex” between consenting adults is “sometimes or always acceptable,” and this includes 36% of self-identified Evangelicals.

West referred to the 2019 television dating game show, “Bachelorette,” and two of its Evangelical stars Hannah Brown and Luke Parker, who “were self-identified Evangelicals.” They “both acknowledged previously having had sex outside of marriage.” Nevertheless, Luke was now endeavoring to be abstinent until marriage, but as the season progressed, it became clear that Hannah held an essentially antinomian approach to sexual morality.  She boasted of sexual encounters with another of the contestants, and declared “I’m a grown woman, I can make my own decisions … I sin daily and Jesus still loves me, and if it’s all forgiven, then no other man, woman, animal can judge me.” West also pointed to an adulterous couple, noted in the news, who each divorced their spouses, sought the forgiveness of God and their divorced spouses, got married, and then defended their choices. But this is not Biblical repentance, West said. He noted that all three Evangelicals were born and raised in the “Bible Belt” of the South.

West said that at Seattle Pacific University, where he once taught, “70% of the faculty voted no confidence” in the Board of Trustees, since the board would not give up the college’s statement on sexual morality, which defended opposite-sex monogamy as the only venue for sexual relations. But the board permitted the hiring of faculty who disagree with the statement and will teach their opinion to students.  Similarly, Fuller Theological Seminary reiterated its commitment to opposite-sex marriage but also said that faithful Christians can reject opposite-sex monogamy. West said that the church at which he had been an elder failed to uphold its own standards on divorce with respect to the divorces of persons “at various levels of leadership” in the church. Also, teaching on Biblical sexuality was not incorporated into the youth program at the same church for fear of alienating the youth. Yet if people are never discipled in this area, either in public or private, sexual sin has gained practical acceptance in the church.

It is in this radically liberalized environment that many Christian leaders are in fact facilitating and defending the anti-Christian morality in which they live and work. Churches and Christian institutions may have formal statements that affirm Biblical faith and morality, but this commitment often is not respected in practice.

He referred to Francis Collins, formerly Director of the National Institutes of Health, a self-professed Evangelical. West said that “under his leadership, the NIH spent millions of tax dollars to fund doctors and hospitals in their promotion of puberty blockers and sex destructive surgeries” for minors and also “identified himself proudly as an ‘ally and advocate’ (his words) of the LGBTQIA+ movement.” Additionally, “he oversaw millions of tax dollars spent to harvest body parts from late-term aborted babies for use in medical research.”  He also pointed to Jimmy Carter, who said in 2018 “that Jesus would approve of gay marriage and I think Jesus would encourage any love affair if it was honest and sincere and was not damaging to anyone else.” As another example, West referred to Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, a life-long Roman Catholic who cast the deciding vote imposing same-sex marriage on the nation, in defiance of the “history and text of the Constitution itself.”. While “Christians are supposed to be salt and light in the culture,” yet we cannot be if our “salt is insipid, and our light is dim.”

These examples led West to say that “most Christians in America grow up in cultural captivity, we are immersed in a hostile culture.” This, he said, is true at “home, school, college, and the workplace.” Especially professional people who become “pastors, professors, ministry leaders, journalists, politicians, or work in the entertainment industry. After you have been immersed for years in an elite culture that rejects orthodox Christianity, you can easily start identifying more with those who hate Christianity.” This is made all the worse because the secular or otherwise non-Christian people one lives with may be personally nice people. In the late twentieth century, as cultural conflict intensified, many Christians believed that getting Christians into leadership positions would win the culture. But experience has shown that many “self-identified Christians in leadership positions at all levels of American society” has not had a significant effect on the culture. Many of these people support by their words and actions the cultural attacks on Christianity. They are “Stockholm Syndrome Christians.”

What Can Be Done

To rectify the problem of Stockholm Syndrome Christianity, we need stronger Christian communities and a greater willingness to emphasize and defend contested standards. We must “lead by example … it’s hard to lead others further than you’ve gone yourself.” Such things as non-marital sex, use of pornography, or treating one’s children “in ungodly and unloving ways” should have no part in a Christian’s life. Secondly, Christians should be equipped to engage the hostile ideas in the culture. Apologetics and even one’s own research are vital here. Thirdly, we should be conscious of the sources of our information. “Many Christians end up adopting … non-Christian views” because they rely on the same secular sources of information hostile to Christian faith and morals as their non-Christian friends and coworkers do. Secular journalism is one source that such ideas can come from. Journalists “overwhelmingly support” abortion and same-sex marriage. In 2013, for instance, the American public was closely divided on same-sex marriage, but a survey of 500 news stories showed stories “slanted to gay marriage” outpacing those opposed by more than 5 to 1. Public opinion regarding same-sex marriage then dramatically changed after this pro-same-sex marriage reporting.

American entertainment is also strongly supportive of non-marital sex and same-sex marriage. In one study, references to non-marital sex outnumbered references to marital sex on the major networks by three to one. Netflix produces scenes about sex between high school and middle school students, rating them not appropriate for adolescents under 17 years old, “but of course Netflix is hoping that they do watch.” A Disney executive claimed that there are many “LGBTQIA” themes in Disney’s stories but pledged to do more. Many Christian news and entertainment sources do exist, but they need to be used instead of secular sources.

Christian parents need to be intentional about raising their children, and ensure that it is not secular entertainment, non-Christian peers, news media, or social media that is actually raising their children. Once a week attendance at church or membership in a youth group “is not enough.” Young people must be helped to develop spiritually by their parents. They must be trained to “see through the culture’s lies.” Teaching about sex in particular should come from parents, not from the many non-Christian sources children and adolescents are exposed to. The culture spends a lot of time trying to convince people that it is impossible to live according to Biblical sexual standards. This seems to have had a real effect, since the majority of self-professed Evangelicals now engage in pre-marital sex. But for those attending church, “the percentage drops significantly.” The more likely a Christian community teaches Biblical morality, the more likely the members of that community are to live by those standards.

Strong religious communities will assist the natural bent of human nature, which the wider society once supported, but now far less so. West mentioned data from the well-respected National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health as confirmation that adolescents do move overall toward opposite sex attraction as young adults. More  optimistically a 2024 study from the Netherlands tracked gender dysphoria, and found that 11% of participants at age 11 “wished to be of the opposite sex,” but at age 26 only 4% did.

West said that there is “a path of fulfillment” within Biblical morality for everyone, whether single or married. He observed that the faith of parents is “significantly correlated” with the morality and resiliency of the parents’ children. If one has fallen away from Biblical faith or morals, God always invites one back.

Questions about Stockholm Syndrome Christianity

A questioner asked where West identified “the roots” of secular ideas in conflict with Christianity. West pointed to Darwin, observing that Darwin held morality to be based “on that which aids physical survival.” It includes the maternal instinct but also includes infanticide. Darwin supported the Victorian morality of his day but held that all morality is relative to time and place, and the underlying basis of morality is fluid. The effect of Darwinism in cultural breakdown he reviewed in a subsequent lecture.

Another questioner asked what Christians who are in positions of influence in the secular culture can do to promote righteousness. West said that in the questioner’s case – working in student government at a secular university – the most important thing is to be a strong supporter of free speech and religious liberty. Many Christian organizations on campus are being pressured to function “under strictures that others aren’t.” He added, however, that there “are some things that are so evil” that a faithful Christian simply must abstain. He gave the example of processing insurance claims for transgender surgeries. One may have to resign if no accommodation to conscience is allowed.

It was also asked if in view of the bleak cultural picture, is there anything Christians can do at this point, what hope is there, and what should we do to be most effective? West responded that “God surprises.” At times in the past, the situation has seemed hopeless, but God intervenes with revival or change of circumstances that moves the world back toward the truth. The Roman persecution in the early history of Christianity, the communist persecution in China and the tremendous growth of Christianity under the communist regime, and the deism and unitarianism of the American Revolution and the early federal period followed by the Second Great Awakening were pointed to. Transgenderism, at least for minors, has become a debatable issue in much of American society. Yet, he emphasized that “our ultimate hope is in God.”

  1. Comment by Gary Bebop on October 31, 2025 at 1:23 pm

    Excellence reporting. Copious insights. Indeed, God surprises. The culture hasn’t been able to sneak past God unnoticed: “Ha! You who hide a plan too deep for the Lord, whose deeds are in the dark, and who say, ‘Who sees us? Who knows us?’ You turn things upside down!” (Isaiah 29:15-16).

  2. Comment by Wilson R. on October 31, 2025 at 1:57 pm

    It’s interesting here that, if Mr. Plasterer is any indication, conservative Christians mainly define themselves these days entirely by issues of sexual morality: same-sex relationships, transgenderism, divorce, and sex and children outside of wedlock.

    No mention of concern for the poor, the hungry, the infirm, and the prisoners (issues by which Jesus defined those who truly followed his way and those who didn’t). No mention of love for neighbor. No condemnation of the worship of mammon.

    Speaking of mammon, if American Christianity ever exhibited a Stockholm Syndrome, it shows in the way the American church has accommodated itself easily to a secular culture that has arguably made the US the most materialistic society in the history of the world. And, take it from someone old enough to remember, this accommodation LONG predated the sexual revolution that conservative Christians decry.

    Finally, isn’t it interesting also that the people talking loudest about concern for the poor, the marginalized, and the immigrant tend not to be conservative Christians but rather their enemies who identify as more secular, even atheist.

    What Jesus said about the prostitutes and tax collectors entering the kingdom of God ahead of the Pharisees applies here. To those with ears, let them listen.

  3. Comment by Salvatore Anthony Luiso on October 31, 2025 at 2:36 pm

    Thank you for this article with astonishing and depressing statistics.

    I wouldn’t use the term “Stockhold Syndrome Christians”: I would just say “worldly Christians”. No Christians are being held hostage in America. Many Christians are conforming themselves to the world in various ways for various reasons.

    Note that some of these ways have nothing to do with sexuality and sexual morality, but with other aspects of morality, e.g. loving one’s enemies.

    To conform themselves to the world, a Christian may go toward the left, toward the right, or toward another direction.

    Sad to say, it is common for those who have gone toward the left accuse those who have gone toward the right of hypocrisy, and vice versa. Both those on the left and the right criticize and reject those Christians who refuse to become worldly as they have.

    Also: Wilson R.’s comment contains good points.

  4. Comment by Glenn Wheeler on November 1, 2025 at 12:56 am

    Wilson,

    Organized Christianity has always–always–changed and accommodated itself to reflect whatever happens to be current in society. So it’s not surprising to see Christianity on the right accommodate iteelf to what’s current in that neck of society and Christianity on the left accommodate itself to what’s current in that neck of society. And neither side has any inkling that’s what they do; in fact, they would look at you as if you were from Mars if you told them that. “Oh no, we don’t do that! It’s only the other side that does that!”

    Since both right and left are thoroughly materialistic, American Christianity has never exhibited more than a passing, surface concern for the poor and downtrodden. Instead, both sides translate those passages out, in favor of selective interpretations that conveniently coincide with their agendas.

    And all the while each side looks down their noses at “everyone else;” i.e., those not like them and obviously not on the same high, superior level that they are on.

  5. Comment by Mark on November 1, 2025 at 12:30 pm

    Sex and abortion. The two most important doctrines of Christianity according to conservative Americans. I knew the moment I read Discovery Institute, this guy was going to find a way to blame Darwin for everything. I wonder though if he believes Christians who consistently vote for leaders that don’t live up to their professed standards in matter of sex and family life (such as Trump) are also under “Stockholm Syndrome” too, or is just leftist influences on Christianity he worries about?

  6. Comment by Qohelet on November 1, 2025 at 11:54 pm

    No matter how many times I read them, arguments that list fornication, gay marriage, and transgender as if they’re similar things are always jarring to me. Like, gay marriage is marriage. Monogamy. Family building. The stuff that creates an environment for raising children. The broader hook up culture I think we could all agree is degrading people and leaving young people in despair about their future prospects. But why are we against people committing to one another.

    And the there’s the poor transgender folks. They’re constantly beat up by conservative Christians who either haven’t read the Bible or are bearing false witness that there’s anything in there condemning transgemder people. The closest there is to a trans person in the Bible is the eunuch in Acts 8 and Philip baptizes him and sends him away rejoicing.

  7. Comment by Glenn Wheeler on November 2, 2025 at 12:37 am

    Qohelet, you wrote about gay marriages…”The stuff that creates an environment for raising children.”

    So where do these children come from that are raised in that wonderful marriage that is, I’m sure, the kind of marriages God prefers? A laboratory? And you seriously think that children created in a laboratory is the natural way of things?

    Wake up! You have been seriously deceived.

  8. Comment by John on November 2, 2025 at 11:56 am

    Glenn Wheeler,

    Gay couples can adopt children, like ancient Christians did in old times, taking in children abandoned and unloved by their natural parents. Their pagan neighbors had trouble believing Christians could love children not of their blood and accused Christians of using the orphans in all manner of dark acts and rituals, not too different from false charges laid on many gay adults today concerning children by conservatives today. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

  9. Comment by Qohelet on November 2, 2025 at 12:55 pm

    No Glenn, I’m a teacher. I’ve seen gay couples rescue kids from the state foster system and let them have good lives. No one else saved those kids.

    Also, no children born with the help of laboratories is a pretty weird extension of the conservative need to control sex. Are we not supposed to use gene therepies to knock out chronic illnesses, which seems to be possible? Are infertile parents not allowed to have fertility treatment?

  10. Comment by Rick Plasterer on November 3, 2025 at 2:53 pm

    WilsonR,

    I assume you realize that you are offering the standard liberal response to any claim that Biblical sexual morality is absolutely essential to Christianity (which it is). Namely that Biblical morality of Pharisaical self-denial and Jesus’ message was all about meeting needs. In fact, sexual morality is central to the Bible from the Garden of Eden to the vice list of damnation in Rev. 21:8 (including Jesus’s vice lists in Matthew 15 and Mark 7). Giving up sexual morality for the modern morality of consent is fatal to the gospel. It is contrary to God’s commands and the church withers and dies.

    I don’t see that liberals and leftists are any more charitable than conservatives. In fact, religious conservatives excel in charitable giving, more than liberals or leftists. The kind of charity liberals believe in is government charity and state control, even control of what is defined as a need. Collectivization just leads to tyranny and poverty, as has been observed for generations.

    Rick

  11. Comment by Wilson R. on November 4, 2025 at 1:10 pm

    Rick:

    I am perfectly capable of saying what I mean without you trying to put words in my mouth that I didn’t use.

    I’m not suggesting that sexual morality doesn’t matter. I’m suggesting that some of you appear to define your Christianity solely by those issues. Jesus doesn’t define discipleship in only those terms, yet some of you never seem to want to talk about the meaning of “love your neighbor.” So it’s fair to ask how you define your faith when traditional sexual morality is all you get exercised about.

    Isn’t it interesting that when Jesus DOES talk about sexual morality, the offenses that he dwells on are ones that create injury to someone else—infidelity, adultery, divorce, and lust. Isn’t it interesting also that the people I generally hear howling the loudest about sexual sins (meaning homosexuality and sex outside of marriage) never seem to bring up divorce. They don’t even talk about marital infidelity the way they talk about sex before marriage. Why is that? Divorce for reasons other than adultery is common. It causes real damage to spouses and children. Jesus explicitly calls it a sin (his condemnation of homosexuality can only be presumed, since the Gospel writers don’t record him saying anything about it.

    And yet, in the eyes of “conservative” Christians, monogamous and stable same-sex relationships are destroying the country, but divorce seems to have been accepted as a fact of our society. And yet divorces have done real damage to multiple generations of our society, because the children of divorce are less likely themselves to get married, lest the same thing happen to their families that happened to them.

  12. Comment by Mark on November 4, 2025 at 1:54 pm

    Rick,

    Actually, a recent study by the University of South Carolina found the difference in charitable giving among conservatives and liberals was negligible. I find it interesting how conservatives hate big government when it comes to providing services for poor and needy, preferring that non-profits, foundations, and individual donors handle this work. Yet when it comes to defense they are in all with big government. I find this especially odd because this would seem to be the issue where we should naturally most suspicious of government. It’s certainly where the Founders were most suspicious and explains why they refrained from even having full-time national army for some years, instead preferring that states handle peacetime defense through volunteer militias (the true purpose of the 2nd Amendment in fact). It strikes me as odd that the same people who cry communism whenever someone proposed universal healthcare or guaranteed income (things many other stable democracies have had for decades) yet turn a blind eye to the manner in which “border security” is allowed to operate deep inside our country’s interior and bypass our civil liberties in name of the immigration law. I find it odd that the same conservatives who claim Mamdani is communist for wanting city-run grocery stores, think it’s not overreach for Trump to threaten to withhold federal aid from NYC if its citizens don’t vote for his preferred mayoral candidate. I find it odd that the same people passing laws banning protesters from wearing masks want to mandate them for ICE agents so that people being abducted right off the street have no idea who’s napping them.

  13. Comment by Wilson R. on November 4, 2025 at 2:09 pm

    Mark, as you may have read, the Trump administration issued threats to grocery stores that were planning to offer discounted prices to SNAP recipients. So they have reached the point where they are even dictating private decisions about charity if it conflicts with their policy.

  14. Comment by Rick Plasterer on November 7, 2025 at 2:47 pm

    Mark,

    Arthur C. Brooks 2007 book, Who Really Cares, maintains that conservatives do more charitable giving, but I’m sure academic research may reach different conclusions.

    In reply to WilsonR, I certainly agree that Evangelicals are wrong to accept divorce and remarriage. In fact, I don’t see any Biblical basis for divorce at all. The most Jesus and Paul sanctioned was separation for adultery. I recall a 2013 talk by Russell Moore that I wrote up for IRD (“Living as a Prophetic Minority.”) He called Evangelicals “slow motion sexual revolutionaries” because they accept divorce and remarriage, but not homosexuality.

    Rick

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The work of IRD is made possible by your generous contributions.

Receive expert analysis in your inbox.