Liberal UMC Clergy Rally Around Oliveto, One-Church Plan

on January 4, 2019

On November 16, the United Methodist Association of Retired Clergy (UMARC), held its second conference for laity and clergy on inclusiveness in the church, called Toward an Inclusive Church II. This unofficial caucus began a couple of years ago within the Mountain Sky Area with a primary focus on offering “unwavering support” to partnered lesbian activist Karen Oliveto’s contested claims to occupy the bishop’s office there. The progressive group convened in St. Andrew United Methodist Church in Highlands Ranch, Colorado to worship and listen to sermons and talks by Bishop Thomas Bickerton of New York and Dr. Karen Oliveto, among others.

In opening remarks, Rev. Mark Feldmeir of St. Andrew described the privilege he gets every Sunday of welcoming people from all walks of life, including “those who are both inclusive and radical in their welcoming as well as those who are evolving” (emphasis added), adding that his church every weekend receives those who are “on that journey of becoming more inclusive.” This echoed similar refrains from other progressive United Methodist groups that greatly prize converting United Methodists to full support of LGBTQ causes in the church.

Bishop Julius Trimble of the Indiana Episcopal Area sent in a video of support and made comments looking ahead to General Conference 2019. “I’m not leaving the church,” he confidently stated. He’s too busy making disciples of Christ, working on the church’s public mission, and praising Jesus, he said. Speaking on the Way Forward he said “the key word on the Commission is ‘forward’,” and this word is also key to the story of the whole Bible. He hopes that leading up to General Conference everyone remembers what they should be working towards: “Not backwards, not a way out, not a way to quit, not a way to claim winners or losers, not a way to start a new church or to reinvent a denomination but a way forward.”

Bishop Thomas Bickerton of New York gave a sermon at the conference’s start. He gave very high praise to “Bishop” Oliveto, remarking that he is awestruck by her current ministry. He even admiringly told her, “I can’t believe I’m standing on the turf where you preside as a bishop of the church.”

Bishop Bickerton’s sermon cited Paul’s words at the opening of Ephesians 4, where the apostle urges the church to be one united body with one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and one God who is over all, through all, and in all. In line with the conference’s focus, the bishop spoke of a “sacrament of inclusion” and quoted Oliveto’s new book: “Our ability to have empathy strengthens our ability to love those who are not like us, even when we disagree.” After giving his sermon, UMARC honored Bishop Bickerton for his extensive work with Imagine No Malaria, a global health program of the UMC which seeks to save lives by helping provide bed nets, diagnostic tests, medicine, and health education in Africa.

In a session titled “Together at the Table,” which is the title of her new book, Oliveto spoke about why she wrote it, and answered many questions about the current state of the UMC, her experiences since her controversial election, and her perspective heading into the special General Conference in February.

Oliveto’s explanation for writing Together at the Table, her second book, was pretty simple; seeing the divide between conservatives and progressives in the UMC she “wanted to figure out how we could bridge the divide between us.”

She sees different perspectives on human sexuality as a matter of opinion, not absolute truths of theology: “We’ve taken an opinion on human sexuality and turned it into doctrine. And I think that’s a grave error… So why are we letting an opinion divide us? …How can we understand that unity doesn’t require uniformity? And part of what that informs that is how we understand God. We understand God to be three in one. God has built diversity into the very godhead, right?”

Without offering any evidence, Oliveto warned that the Traditional Plan would be a first step of a greater movement that would marginalize communities beyond the LGBT: “My biggest fear is if we move to the traditionalist model, that that’s only the first line in the sand. We haven’t learned our lessons. We’ve debated and we’ve gotten through one point, but we haven’t learned from the past.”

In her view, the Western Jurisdiction is already living out the “One Church Plan” and is proof that it works. “The local church already has people who disagree strongly but who love each other and are committed to mission together.” Her jurisdiction breaks the church’s rules “because God has brought people into our lives that have helped us change.” She did not mention how her election brought a “financial crisis” to her area, her heavy-handed intimidations of evangelicals, the Western Jurisdiction’s ruthless exclusion of traditionalist United Methodists, and how despite encompassing some areas of rapid population growth, the geographically huge Western Jurisdiction is losing members more rapidly than any of the UMC’s other U.S. jurisdictions.

A denominational split carries a lot more downside than staying together, she believes. For one, the only hope for our secular society is Jesus Christ, “And if we as the church of Jesus Christ can’t figure out a way to live together, what hope is there for the world?”

When asked what would change for their local churches if the “One Church Plan” (OCP), which she supports, passes, Oliveto insisted that “nothing has to happen.” She dismissed the potential pressure on pastors, saying that the plan would not require them to do gay weddings, and that clergy already have the option to refuse any wedding. She added that churches can decide how open they will be, what weddings they will allow, but that at a basic level they will not have to do anything. The OCP “simply gives breathing room for those places where we’re already living into a more inclusive church.”

That last line is illustrative of how Oliveto’s explanation is severely limited. The Western Jurisdiction, including the Mountain Sky Area that Oliveto oversees, is composed overwhelmingly of progressive congregations, pastors, and lay people. As the “bishop” explained minutes before, this region is already going against the United Methodist Church’s teaching and rules on human sexuality as they apply to ordination, marriages, and more. Because the OCP would legitimize most of their disobedience and unfaithfulness, no difficult conversation may be necessary after February in the churches of the UMARC participants. However, this will not be the case for most United Methodists and their local churches. The Western Jurisdiction, after all, is home to less than 3% of the UMC’s members.

When one questioner brought up the Simple Plan, Oliveto expressed mixed approval for the plan put out by the “Queer Clergy Caucus.” This plan would move the UMC in a similar direction as the OCP, but would also roll back UMC’s teachings and policies against adultery and pre-marital sex, and would not make any pretense of protecting the consciences of traditionalist clergy and congregations. Oliveto observed of the Simple Plan: “

It doesn’t quite have the softer language [of the OCP]. I also think, I’m going to be honest, they also removed language about fidelity in marriage and celibacy in singleness, and I think then it turns it into a moral document. And I think it will not get the votes it needs because of that. That’s my interpretation. I think otherwise, it was great. If they left that in there it would be a stronger petition. The One Church leaves that in there.

When asked for her reaction to recent news that the California-Nevada Conference and Bishop Minerva Carcaño have sued the Glide Foundation board of trustees for control of the Glide United Methodist “church,” Oliveto, previously pastor there, said she was stunned and saddened. Glide, which calls itself “a social justice movement, social service provider and spiritual community,” has been the subject of controversy in recent years. Oliveto said she has kept her nose out of the situation and does not know the details of the story, despite her long history there. She expressed very strong support for the San Francisco-based institution, stating that Glide is what made her a good bishop because of the lessons she learned there, particularly by serving the needy and marginalized. Oliveto spoke extensively about her time there, relaying statistics and stories of Glide’s sizeable social programs, but did not ever mention sharing the Gospel or developing disciples of Jesus Christ.

The “bishop” also gave a sermon to close the conference. She told the story of a California town known for its disproportionately high number of graveyards, to discuss how nowadays she sees “dead” people everywhere because of the way the UMC treats LGBT persons and debates issues surrounding human sexuality.

The closets that LGBT people are forced into are like tombs, she said, creating in them a deadness even though they are physically alive. Not only are these people dead, but so are those who are not LGBT-affirming: “I see dead people every time I go to General Conference, minds closed to the latest knowledge of homosexuality, found not only in social and medical sciences, but also through critical engagement with sacred texts and traditions of Christianity.” She went on to offer a curious reinterpretation of Jesus Christ’s raising Lazarus from the dead: “Jesus stands at our closet tombs and calls us to come out but he doesn’t stop there. You’ll recall that Lazarus, when he arose from the tomb, Jesus then turns to the community, and tells them ‘Unbind him,’ let him go. Lazarus can be released from death’s chains only if those around him free him from his bonds, and the same is true of us.”

In summary, progressive bishops and their allies continue to evangelize for the “One Church Plan” and continue to give limited, misleading explanations on how it will affect the United Methodist Church. Amidst this, there are two truths spoken at the conference that we should hold on to. First, that Jesus Christ is the only hope for this world and that our witness as a church that follows Him matters immensely. Secondly, theological traditionalists as well as revisionists in the UMC need to develop and show through their actions greater empathy for one another, despite all the challenges.

  1. Comment by Kris Aves on January 4, 2019 at 3:49 pm

    This United Methodist faithful certified lay servant from the NIC would vote for the One Church Plan. So, leave if you wish. We will continue and move to the ideal of open doors, open minds, and open hearts. I for one want rid of the homophobia once and for all.

  2. Comment by Lizzie warren on February 20, 2019 at 8:39 am

    Phobia means fear. I’m not afraid of homosexuals. Instead I feel sorrow for their poor life choice.

  3. Comment by Roger on January 4, 2019 at 5:09 pm

    The Liberal Progressives can be seen as an unfaithful spouse in which they want to continue in a union but yet want to continue in their unfaithfulness to their vows made to the Church and to God. The Traditionalist says we cannot continue in this unfaithful union. Progressives you are free to leave but you cannot continue in your unfaithful ways. You must decide to become faithful to the vows you professed long ago or leave to follow your unfaithfulness. East is East and West is West and never shall the twain meet till earth and sky stand presently at God’s great judgement seat.

  4. Comment by David on January 5, 2019 at 11:53 am

    There was a time when the UMC had no opinion on birth control or abortion, and subsequently supported Roe v. Wade. I am sure this was adopted after much prayer and discernment, but then it was thrown out after the conservative takeover at the last GC. This same type of thing has happened elsewhere be it the Southern Baptists or the National Rifle Association. The issue is not religion, but politics—the culture war that has been going on since before the Civil War. Often the country divides along the old free/slave state lines. Liberals probably feel that the church has left them.

    I suggest churches not feel so smug that they alone have morality. Given that over 2/3 of Americans feel same sex marriage is proper, churches that reject it will likely be seen are increasingly bigoted in the future and something to be avoided. The hypocritical use of Bible idolatry with certain parts being specifically ignored to support certain viewpoints will be their downfall.

  5. Comment by Palamas on January 5, 2019 at 8:45 pm

    Congratulations, David. That screed must set some kind of record for the most straw men, logical fallacies, political cliches, and downright lies stuffed into the fewest words I’ve ever seen. You’ll make a great Unitarian minister someday.

  6. Comment by William on January 6, 2019 at 2:56 pm

    You just might be on to something.

  7. Comment by James on January 17, 2019 at 2:45 pm

    And when did your downfall occur?
    You know, all of the lost sound exactly the same. Singing the “song of the dammed” all the way off the cliff.

    There is this tone in their vomiting up of the Accusers company line that they’re completely blind to. Complete slaves.
    It’s like someone on death row spitting and mocking at a person praying for them.
    They project their own hateful attitudes on us because they cannot imagine anyone couldn’t be as depraved as they are. They just don’t understand the pity we have for them. God knows who are His. False Christians being weeded out can only help us. It’s always been that way.

    But you sir are the lost. Your soul is black and all this false humility and pretending you’re all about love and acceptance is so transparent, so very embarrassing, that it’s impossible to take any of you children seriously. We get it… you’re a Pest, but you people are just injuring yourselves. Digging your Graves deeper each day.

  8. Comment by William on January 4, 2019 at 6:20 pm

    Telling me what my itching ears want to hear does not rescue me from hell. It only greases the skids for my decent there. If these progressives can “convert” the entire UMC to their “inclusiveness” idol, then the whole denomination can decend into hell as this one unified, inclusive body that they speak of. These folks may even be outdoing Satan here with their lies, their deception, their distortion, and their convoluted rhetoric. And, they appear to take themselves seriously.

    But, Jesus tells us:

  9. Comment by Chas on January 5, 2019 at 6:20 am

    Bickerton is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He has a good portion of the New York Conference mesmerized by the words that flow off his tongue like honey. He gives the impression that he is everyone’s friend. Even his cabinet is blinded by his smooth and slick way of communicating. He is a false prophet who will help bring down both the NYAC and the denomination if he and his cronies succeed in this heretical quest…

  10. Comment by David F Miller on January 5, 2019 at 1:47 pm

    This article may be the final straw. Bickerton is the Bishop the NYAC. His statements regarding Oliveto are unacceptable. I have tried to be patient waiting for the 2019 Special conference but now I see that no matter its outcome Bickerton, and like minded clergy seek to under the Biblical Church . This appears to be heresy. Why are they not called on it. I cannot wait any longer. It is time to leave.

  11. Comment by David F Miller on January 5, 2019 at 1:48 pm

    This article may be the final straw. Bickerton is the Bishop the NYAC. His statements regarding Oliveto are unacceptable. I have tried to be patient waiting for the 2019 Special conference but now I see that no matter its outcome Bickerton, and like minded clergy seek to undermine the Biblical Church . This appears to be heresy. Why are they not called on it. I cannot wait any longer. It is time to leave.

  12. Comment by Skipper on January 7, 2019 at 10:42 am

    This attack on the UMC is the most serious ever. It must be turned back by passing the Traditional Plan with an exit plan to make it easy for dissenters to go their own way.

    “Genuine righteousness leads to life,
    but pursuing evil leads to death.” Proverbs 11:19

    It is so tragic that they insist on “the way that seems right to a man” as in Proverbs 14:12.

  13. Comment by K.G. Goodwright on January 7, 2019 at 10:57 am

    If Oliveto believes the traditional church’s stance on human sexuality is based on opinion and not the Bible, then is the whole Bible just an opinion?
    “We’ve taken an opinion on human sexuality and turned it into doctrine. And I think that’s a grave error… So why are we letting an opinion divide us? …”

  14. Comment by bob on January 9, 2019 at 11:36 am

    HL Mencken commented that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard. The WJ elected Karen, whose track record in her 8 years at Glide saw the elimination of communion and Christian baptism in worship, a drop from 3,600 to possibly as few as 900 in worship (Jay Williams honest count for 2017), Jesus’ name omitted from any website reference, 30,000 constituent members claimed (more than 41 annual conferences), no SPRC-Finance-Trustees-Council-Charge Conference, and active collusion with the secular and independent Glide Foundation to strip the church of denominational property and resources. Somehow I doubt any informed person in her conference is praying, “Lord, use her to do it again.” And that is tragedy.

  15. Comment by Dr. Charles Klink on January 10, 2019 at 6:24 am

    I am always so amazed at the way UM leaders are using language to “schmooze”, amuse, and abuse one another. And what I mean by this is the slick use of “making disciples.” This phrase has become a UM way to say we want people — “get the numbers of persons so we can make apportionment requests” — and sound like we are spiritual, when, in reality, we are wanting to remain a religious political caucus/voice. “Making disciples” is a way of saying we — humans — get numbers but make no mention about a focus on reaching and teaching of God’s Spirit being the source of our purpose, a Church where persons will come and be open to receiving God’s Spirit in lives. We have said, “God, we aren’t sure Your way will work, so we will work to get persons in church without expectation of spiritual change in lives. That’s too nebulous and unpredictable. So, God, we will take care of that and be the place where persons gather, join, and we will focus on social adjustment/change in lives and focus. But, thanks for allowing us to use Your church for this gathering!” We don’t need a General Conference to discuss social agenda…we need a church where the Holy Spirit once again “births” a movement of hope, possibility and spiritual salvation because GOD acts as happened in the Book of Acts! (not some gathering of human beings (read “General Conference”).

  16. Comment by Gay Crandell on January 11, 2019 at 5:26 pm

    It is sad that people are leaving the Bible out of their lives and trying to change the Methodist Church… Read Romans… all the way through… If you do not want to follow God’s word than just leave the Methodist Church and make your own plans with Satan… that is where you are heading… May God forgive these people for their lies and unchristian ways. So Sad!!!

  17. Comment by Matthew on January 12, 2019 at 11:43 pm

    These snakes have no fear of leading their flocks astray. There will be a reckoning one day.

  18. Comment by PFSchaffner on January 16, 2019 at 6:21 pm

    Our large and active UMC church (I’m an attender, not a member) finally had to acknowledge the Way Forward issue at a special meeting last night. It was clear that the GC is faced with the same choice as in Ghostbusters: doom for the denomination is certain (unless perhaps they do nothing); the only question now is “the form of the destructor.” “Choose and perish.” Even the Traditional Plan, the cleanest option, the one with the fewest side effects on denominational agencies, and the one that has some chance of retaining a Methodist church that Wesley would recognize, depends on gently shedding the Progressive congregations and is guaranteed to cause some heartache in the mixed (“purple”) congregations, as well as a poorer and smaller denomination. The absurd ‘connexional’ plan simply acknowledges schism and asks churches to choose whether they’re blue, red, or purple; it raises more issues and solves none. The Bishops’ Plan (frighteningly called “One Church”) is clearly designed to isolate, marginalize, and finally eject conservatives without providing any landing place for them: its appeal to the Bishops is doubtless that of a neutron bomb: it preserves the (profitable) structure of churches and church properties even if it risks killing all the life within them.

The work of IRD is made possible by your generous contributions.

Receive expert analysis in your inbox.