January 8, 2018

You Might Have a Case of Mainline Myopia If…

Among members of America’s mainline Protestant denominations, there is a sadly widespread condition I call “mainline myopia.”

I realize that the use of the term “mainline” to describe certain churches is contested in various ways. Some argue that these denominations are now more accurately described as “oldline” or even “sideline.” Within my own denomination, the United Methodist Church, one of our leading theological voices, Professor Scott Kisker, has powerfully argued in his brief, easy-to-read Mainline or Methodist? Rediscovering Our Evangelistic Mission that in pursuing a mainline Protestant identity, leaders of our denomination across many decades have betrayed some very core treasures of our particular tradition. Similar internal critiques have arisen within other mainline denominations.

But for the sake of convenient reference, I am here using “mainline” to refer to the denominations that were in 1989 identified as “the seven sisters”: The United Methodist Church, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), the Presbyterian Church (USA), the Episcopal Church, the United Church of Christ, the American Baptist Churches USA, and the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ).

What these all have in common is a combination of a long history of overlap with America’s elite cultural establishment (in contrast to newer and/or more counter-cultural denominations), significant influence of theological liberalism, majority-white membership, and affiliation with the National Council of Churches.

Suffering from mainline myopia involves living in a bubble with no meaningful Christian fellowship with non-mainline believers, having an tunnel-vision view of Christian faith and the church that ignores the realities of other Christian churches, lacking much self-awareness of how much U.S. mainline Protestantism is really a tiny and shrinking fraction of even American Protestantism (let alone the wider, global body of Christ across 2,000 years), and often uncritically accepting even the most striking biases and blind spots promoted by mainline denominational leaders.

So for fellow members of the above-listed denominations, I have provided a handy guide of the top 25 symptoms you can check to test your level of infection with this harmful but often undetected condition.

You might have a case of mainline myopia if you are a member of one of these denominations and (in no particular order):

1.    You have ever used a phrase like “all the major denominations” or “the churches in America” and not meant to include any outside of those identified above.

2.    You have mentally or verbally used such dismissive classifications as “VERY conservative,” “ultra right-wing,” “extreme,” and/or “fundamentalist” to describe the renewal movement(s) within your denomination, or for that matter, institutions like Fuller Seminary or InterVarsity Christian Fellowship.

3.    You are significantly more theologically liberal than any of the folk listed in the previous item, and yet think of or call yourself a “centrist,” somehow.

4.    You think that two or more of these theological descriptors mean the same thing: “orthodox,” “creedal,” “evangelical,” and “fundamentalist.”

5.    You have never heard of an actual case happening within the last couple of decades, not even to friends of friends, of a lay member of a local congregation facing formal church discipline.

6.    You think of your own denomination as being, overall, racially diverse in its American context (never minding what the record actually shows).

7.    You use “the young people” to refer to those in your church younger than 60.

8.    You have ever excused your congregation’s or denomination’s decline with the (absolutely false) claim that “well, all churches are declining in America.”

9.    You think it is obvious that such values as compassion for the poor automatically and necessarily involve strong support for an expanded federal welfare state, more progressive taxation, and liberal Democratic politicians. And you do not readily admit that this involves any partisan or left-of-center ideological biases on your part, but insist that this is just a very simple and undebatable matter of being faithful to the Gospel.

10.    You assume that someone having a high position in your particular denomination’s hierarchy, such as a bishop or a denominational agency staffer, is any evidence of them being a spiritually mature disciple of Jesus Christ.

11.    Your idea of Christian ecumenism is largely limited to (1) working with members of other mainline denominations on feel-goody secular social causes and/or (2) nominal Methodists who don’t really follow John Wesley’s theology, nominal Lutherans who don’t really follow Martin Luther’s theology, and nominal Presbyterians who don’t really follow John Calvin’s theology sitting around to share their disdain for traditionalist evangelicals and Catholics.

12.    You would find it more shocking, unacceptable, and wrong if a leader of your denomination declared that he did not support women’s ordination than if he refused to unambiguously affirm the historic, bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ.

13.    After reading the previous item, you are more concerned about questioning if John Lomperis supports women’s ordination (for the record, I do) than about removing the resurrection-deniers from leadership in your denomination.

14.    You are utterly unfamiliar with complementarian vs. egalitarian, cessationist vs. charismatic, or pre-trib vs. post-trib debates. (Bonus point if you have no idea what any of those terms even mean!)

15.    You are unaware of how much of the body of Christ in this country views your denomination as not just having different opinions, but as apostate.

16.    You cannot remember the last time you seriously, non-jokingly called something “heretical.” You don’t use such language, which you regard as extremely outdated.

17.    You sometimes use the phrase “people used to believe…” in reference to traditional beliefs and values still held by a great many Christians (outside of your circles).

18.    You think of approval of homosexual practices as the sort of matter on which Christians are very divided, with little appreciation of how marginal support for revisionist agendas is among the body of Christ as a whole.

19.    You think that the use of male-gender pronouns for God is one of the major reason churches fail to attract more people.

20.    You assume that New Testament warnings against individuals within the church who are false teachers and/or seek to use religion for their own financial gain could obviously not apply to any leaders within your denomination’s hierarchy.

21.    You think of it as unusual or extreme for a non-ordained Christian to have actually read the entirety of the Bible.

22.    You do not think it’s odd when leaders in your church speak as if those you should seek to draw in are limited to religious “nones” – to the implied exclusion of atheists, adherents of other religions, and merely nominal Christians.

23.    You have not received much teaching in your congregation on many biblical passages other than Matthew 7:1a (“Do not judge…”), 1 John 4:8b (“…because God is love”), and Micah 6:8b (“…what does the LORD require of you, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God?”).

24.    As an Episcopalian, you find yourself at least quietly nodding in agreement with the quote attributed to a professor in your denomination: “Every funeral service conducted with the 1928 Book of Common Prayer brings the Episcopal Church one step closer to justice.”

25.    When you hear the terms “evangelical” or “megachurch,” you immediately think of one or more of these images:

 

(Photo credits, clockwise from top left: Harley Pebley/Wikimedia Commons, Robert Wilonsky/YouTube, Robert M. Worsham/Wikimedia Commons, and Pixabay.  Kudos to my colleagues Jeff Walton and Joseph Rossell for, respectively, contributing #24 and #25.)

 

So, Dear Readers, how did you do with the above check-up? How many of these symptoms of this serious condition have you found in yourself?

None: Congratulations, you get a clean bill of health! Remember to exercise, and come back to see us again within the year.

1-2: Early warning signs. Let this be a friendly wake-up call.

3-5: Uh-oh. This merits some significant self-reflection, and such New Year’s resolutions as intentionally studying Scripture and the original theological writings of your denomination’s founders, widening your social circles, and thinking more critically and broad-mindedly about some of the rhetoric you may be accustomed to using and hearing in church contexts.

5-9: You appear to have a serious case. I would prescribe tutoring to help you get deprogrammed.

10 or more: Advanced Stage Mainline Myopia (ASMM)! Pray for a miraculous healing – remembering that the God of orthodox faith is one of miracles.

In all seriousness, I have seen first-hand how mainline myopia is rather crippling for people’s faith, and leads to such things as passive acceptance of mediocrity, alienation from the wider body of Christ, and approaching faith with a set of priorities very different from, and at times directly contrary to, the priorities of Scripture and the riches of their own denomination’s theological tradition.

If you know of other symptoms of mainline myopia besides the 25 listed above, please let us know in the comments!


23 Responses to You Might Have a Case of Mainline Myopia If…

  1. carrie says:

    You think abortion is “saving babies” from a miserable life of being unwanted and unloved.

  2. theenemyhatesclarity says:

    You are incredulous that someone would choose to die rather than renounce Jesus.

    In Christ,

    The enemy hates clarity

  3. diaphone64 says:

    You think Leviticus 18:22 is no longer relevant, but all the other verses are still “like, totally, eww and like, an abomination”.

  4. diaphone64 says:

    You demand marriage “equality” for LGBT, but conveniently ignore that the B’s need to marry more than one person to get “equality”.

  5. diaphone64 says:

    You think a “religion” invented by a lying, thieving, raping, murdering pedophile worships the same god as Christians.

  6. Jim says:

    Excellent piece. #23 in particular had me nodding my head vigorously.

  7. Kevin says:

    Here are my 21 signs that your church might be in trouble
    21 Your adult Sunday school class has a discussion on which of the ten commandments no longer apply
    20 The church dinners are held at McDonald’s
    19 The local Baptist church offers to buy your mailing list so they can reach out to the unchurched.
    18 A realtor makes an offer for your building so he can develop it into condos.
    17 Your pastor can’t make the afterhours meetings because he had to take a second job.
    16 Your Social Justice Action Team is lobbying to save the James River Smelt from extinction
    15 You just found out that your church has a Social Justice Action Team.
    14 You hear that we need a leader with a “prophetic voice”
    13 The worship committee wants to hold joint services with the Unitarians down the street.
    12 The parishioners on the left side of the main aisle refuse to look at those on the right side.
    11 You fire the organist to save on operating expenses
    10 When you reorganize your committees you can do so in one meeting by simply switching chairs.
    9 Your lay leader thinks we should tone down the mention of Jesus since we might be offending Muslims and Hindus
    8 Your bishop tells you that we are going to “live into” our current tensions.
    7 Problems? What Problems?
    6 Your pastor pulls you aside after the service and asks if you can recommend a good lawyer.
    5 You hear a call to embrace new things.
    4 Your church is entering a float in the local gay pride parade.
    3 The Sunday School classrooms are used to store the folding chairs.
    2 The Church Women’s group is getting a bus trip together for the pro-choice rally in Washington DC.
    1 Your bishop makes a desperate plea for everyone to quit arguing and can’t we all just get along?

  8. Luke says:

    My experience within Mainline churches (I’ve regularly attended 5 ELCA churches in 4 cities – I’m 28) is that this sort of “myopia” simultaneously is and is not widespread, at least in the ELCA.

    Simply put, the more dedicated a person seems to be to the ELCA brand – the clergy and the laity who eagerly sit on synodical committees, etc, the more likely they are to fall into the above description. The folks who aren’t – either those who still pine for the old ALC or just think of themselves simply as Lutherans or Christians not only don’t fit the description in the article, but are generally even more annoyed with the activist wing of their church (when they’re aware of its existence and activities) than many conservative evangelicals are.

    A key to understanding the ELCA and probably the other mainlines is that they are bitterly divided churches – typically a heavy majority of the clergy pitted against a majority of the laity. That toxic dynamic alone, I suspect, is responsible for some of the mainline’s membership losses.

    • John Lomperis says:

      Excellent point, Luke. In my observation, the more an individual is involved in the denominational leadership structures beyond the local church, the more likely they are to suffer from Mainline Myopia. Conversely, this is MUCH less common among the church members in the pews, who may be nobodies in the eyes of their bishops, whoever they may be in the Kingdom of God.

  9. Dan W says:

    1 – Lay Leadership decides we can no longer display the American flag, State flag or Christian flag in the Sanctuary.
    2 – Veterans and Veterans Day are no longer recognized but Pride Weekend is a big deal.

  10. Andrew Hughes says:

    Thank you John. Great article

  11. carrie says:

    Oh, and…You’ve forgotten why the church ever sent out missionaries. You are irritated and annoyed that the gospel was actually believed in places like Africa (Zimbabwe, Uganda, Malawi, etc.). Now those nations screw up the vote when we want to live however we please! (@UMC) # Wedon’tneedyourinterference,thankyouverymuch! # weluvcannibals # peoplefromthecountrythatbroughtthegospeltousarenowpreachingadifferentgospel

  12. Lynn Malone says:

    Great article, John! I especially appreciate 7, 14, 19 and 23! Blessings!

  13. Loren Golden says:

    You might have Mainline Myopia if…
    You like the idea of including Evangelicals in your Mainline denomination, but your conference/synod/diocese/presbytery will not ordain or install candidates for ministry who graduated from a seminary that still teaches (or was founded to teach) the same theology that (the rest of) the seminaries in your denomination have deliberately abandoned in order to teach a more Progressive theology, and you think that’s a good thing.

  14. Dave Gingrich says:

    A lot smiles through tears here. Thank you, especially to the commenters, for views obviously based on real and painful experiences.

  15. Byrom Wehner says:

    I find the points listed by John in “You might have…” and those listed by responders to be fascinating and right on point. I could probably add some more which I’ve heard. As a second-time member of a more conservative UMC in my area – and that by God’s clear leading – I bring a somewhat interesting church background to my new relationship as a restored member of the UMC. I spent 24 years as a Methodist member (not counting my pre-confirmation years), several years as a member of a “laid-back” Assemblies of God church, a brief membership in a Presbyterian church, and then about 30 years as a member of no church. I’m a non-committee member of our administrative board, and I think I’d be surprised if offered membership on a committee. My particular church is in the midst of thinking about a new vision for our church, as promulgated by “church leaders” – whoever they are – and staff. It is a vision which I’m not yet certain is God’s vision. I may have to soon, and respectfully, challenge that thinking, and I think I know how that may not be well received by some/many.

  16. Bebe Cofer says:

    Any comment on Lutheran Church Missouri Synod?

  17. Pastor Bryan Anderson says:

    very comical, yet very helpful. lets see how long it takes for a “tolerant progressive” to tear this down in the name of “justice” and “speaking truth to power”

  18. Roger says:

    Your Church may have Myopia, if your Pastor only preaches from the 4 Gospels and uses the Sermon on the Mount for most of their Sermons. Also they will not talk about Paul’s epistles.

  19. Donald says:

    You are not aware your denomination is in a race to see which one can get below 1M members first. Clue – the PC(USA) is currently in the lead at 1.4M.

  20. Roxanne says:

    Donald. . .UCC 2017 Statistical Profile reports 880,383 members.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *