2016 UMC General Conference

43 ARTICLES IN THIS TOPIC


May 5, 2016

Unilateral Defiance on Gay Clergy Declared by New York, Baltimore-Washington Methodists

On the eve of the United Methodist Church’s General Conference, two declining liberal regional bodies within the church are openly defying the denomination’s policies forbidding the ordination of sexually active gay clergy.

The Baltimore-Washington and New York Annual Conference boards of ordained ministry (BOOM) announced in a May 3 open letter that they will no longer “inquire about the sexual orientation of their candidates” and are calling upon other boards to do the same.

“While there continues to be significant debate about human sexuality in our church and broader culture, there is an emerging consensus of the UM voices in the United States which believe that our denomination has placed unhealthy prohibitions on the full participation of LGBTQ persons in the life of our church, but which are unwilling to act on this conviction for fear of stepping outside the order of the church,” the letter reads. Declaring their unilateral defiance, the two Annual Conference BOOMs “have independently decided that it is time to create the space to act out of our freedom of conscience, and our experience of God’s power at work through women and men who identify themselves as LBGTQ disciples of Jesus Christ.”

The declaration seeks to pressure the denomination’s top legislative gathering, meeting May 10-20 in Portland, Oregon, which is sharply divided between primarily U.S.-based LGBT advocates and a global coalition that seeks to uphold traditional Methodist teachings on marriage and sexuality.

The letter’s authors, the Rev. Dr. Charles A. Parker of the Baltimore-Washington Annual Conference, and the Rev. Dr. William B. Pfohl of the New York Annual Conference, maintain that the boards of ordained ministry “have the right to make recommendations to their Annual Conferences based on standards for effectiveness worked out collaboratively with the cabinet and their discernment of the fitness, readiness, and fruitfulness of individual candidates.”

Church policies forbid sexually active gay clergy, but some officials charged with screening candidates have skirted the Book of Discipline language forbidding the ordination of “self-avowed, practicing homosexuals” by avoiding asking clergy direct questions. In some cases, offending clergy avoid answering direct questions about sexual activity with the same-sex, claiming to follow the letter of the law, since if a prospective candidate does not self-avow they may claim that there is “insufficient evidence” that they are sexually active.

A petition supported by the Institute on Religion & Democracy’s UMAction Committee and allied renewal organizations closes this loophole by defining “self-avowed” to include being joined in a legal same-sex marriage. Under the proposal, if a clergy member is in such a relationship, it is sufficient grounds for removal from ministry – with no need to ask probing questions about their sexual activity to prove that they are self-avowed.

The BOOM letter from the two annual conferences is not the only declaration of ecclesiastical disobedience in the lead-up to General Conference. Fifteen clergy and candidates for ordination in New York publicly came out as “lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer” in a May 1 open letter to the people of the United Methodist Church.

“We call on LGBTQI United Methodist clergy and candidates everywhere to come out and join us in the refusal of further acquiescence to a system that silences and excludes LGBTQI people,” the letter declares. The clergy group also called upon Boards of Ordained Ministry to refuse to “publicly declare their refusal” to enforce existing prohibitions and upon bishops to refuse to process complaints against sexually active LGBTQI clergy.

Both of the two annual conferences have been locked into membership and attendance decline for some time. The New York Annual Conference lost 4.2 percent of its membership and 6.3 percent of its reported weekly attendance between 2013 and 2014. The Baltimore-Washington Annual conference lost 1 percent of membership and 3 percent of attendance during the same time period. In the first half of the decade, Baltimore-Washington has seen a 10 percent decline in total attendance while New York has witnessed an 18 percent decline.

Those regions in the global church seeking to uphold traditional Methodist teaching on marriage and sexuality are the fastest-growing regions of the church, especially those found in Africa, which have reported a combined increase of approximately 250,000 members each year. In contrast, the U.S.-based jurisdictions have reported an average loss of 100,000 members a year.

UPDATE [5/6/2016]:  The Pacific Northwest Annual Conference Board of Ordained Ministry has joined the Baltimore-Washington and New York annual conferences in opening the door to non-celibate homosexual clergy. In a May 5 vote, the board affirmed that “people of all sexual orientations and gender identities” can meet standards for “fitness, readiness, and effectiveness in ministry.” The board wrote that it was already operating with such an understanding, but “At this critical time in the history of The United Methodist Church, we believe it is important to state explicitly how we have been operating implicitly.”


6 Responses to Unilateral Defiance on Gay Clergy Declared by New York, Baltimore-Washington Methodists

  1. the_enemy_hates_clarity says:

    If 10% of the UMC churches in the US began withholding apportionments, this would stop.

    In Christ,

    The enemy hates clarity

  2. Dan says:

    Are LGBTQ candidates in these rogue conferences required to be faithful in monogamous marriage and celibate in singleness, or have these conferences instituted a blanket “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy for all thing sexual?

    • Jeff Walton says:

      The two boards “have decided to not inquire about the sexual orientation of their candidates” — but the letter doesn’t say anything about marital faithfulness.

  3. Steve Heyduck says:

    Do other BOOMs inquire as to each candidate’s orientation and practice? Should BOOMs be required to do so?

  4. Grant Magnuson says:

    In late 1735, John Wesley was on a ship to the New World from England. When the weather went sour, the ship found itself in serious trouble. Wesley, also chaplain of the vessel, feared for his life. But he noticed that the group of German Moravians, who were on their way to preach to American Indians, were not afraid at all. In fact, throughout the storm, they sang calmly. When the trip ended, he asked the Moravian leader about his serenity, and the Moravian responded with a question: Did he, Wesley, have faith in Christ? Wesley said he did, but later reflected, “I fear they were vain words.”

    But he noticed that the group of German Moravians, who were on their way to preach to American Indians, were not afraid at all. In fact, throughout the storm, they sang calmly. When the trip ended, he asked the Moravian leader about his serenity, and the Moravian responded with a question: Did he, Wesley, have faith in Christ? Wesley said he did, but later reflected, “I fear they were vain words.”

    On May 24, 1738, he had an experience that changed everything. He described the event in his journal: “In the evening, I went very unwillingly to a society in Aldersgate Street, where one was reading Luther’s preface to the Epistle to the Romans. About a quarter before nine, while he was describing the change which God works in the heart through faith in Christ, I felt my heart strangely warmed. I felt I did trust in Christ, Christ alone for salvation, and an assurance was given me that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.”
    Is the United Methodist Church in the business of legalizing sin like the United States Supreme Court is?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *