Church Officials Call for Increased Federal Role in Ending Hunger by 2030

on September 22, 2015

Officials from more than 60 U.S. religious organizations have pledged an end to hunger within 15 years in a statement released this week. Organized by the Washington, D.C.-based advocacy organization Bread for the World, the statement is timed with the arrival of Pope Francis on his first visit to the United States.

The officials see an ally in the Pope with his calls for poverty alleviation, believing that his U.S. visit and address to the Congress could coalesce support around federal programs that they insist have been disproportionately cut following the economic recession. Private charity was briefly acknowledged as a helpful means to combat hunger, but the officials focused upon increased federal spending as essential.

“100 faith leaders commit themselves to end hunger by 2030 – but this will not happen unless the U.S. government takes stronger leadership on this issue,” declared Bread for the World President David Beckmann at a Tuesday morning press conference to announce the pledge.

Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) General Minister and President Sharon E. Watkins stated that the 2008 financial crisis brought about a corresponding food crisis due to “deep and disproportionate cuts” in federal spending on anti-hunger programs.

“Congress needs to steer away from brinksmanship and put an end to the sequester,” Watkins said in reference to budget battles among lawmakers attempting to either preserve or limit the growth of federal spending.

The seven officials present at the National Press Club in Washington from Catholic, Mainline Protestant, Evangelical, Jewish and Muslim traditions could “accurately claim to represent the entire faith community,” Beckmann asserted. The pledge is signed by liberals such as Sojourners’ Jim Wallis, Episcopal Church Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori and National Council of Churches’ President Jim Winkler, as well as Evangelicals like Wesleyan Church General Superintendent JoAnn Lyon, National Association of Evangelicals’ Vice President for Government Relations Galen Carey and Salvation Army National Commander David Jeffrey.

“Our coming together last night represented our belief that the ways in which Pope Francis has addressed issues of hunger, poverty, the misalignment of economic and other related issues in the world will mean a more extensive hearing of those issues,” shared Bishop Lawrence Reddick III of the Christian Methodist Episcopal Church.

A loosening of U.S. immigration policies was also suggested by several speakers.

“We see this as a systemic issue – it’s not lost on us that the Pope has talked about both hunger and immigration, and they are both on the same spectrum of addressing the lives of vulnerable people,” said National Latino Evangelical Coalition President Gabriel Salguero. “This is probably the most urgent issue of our generation, to end hunger by 2030.”

Salguero charged that his hopefulness around the goal was not naiveté.

“We’ve made significant advances over the past 10 years to eradicate extreme poverty at home and abroad,” Salguero noted. “I fervently believe that the people of my generation and millennials together with the veteran leadership of my sisters and brothers across faith lines can end hunger by 2030. Part of that is addressing issues of migration and immigration reform.”

“Immigration reform and the issue of hunger are interconnected,” Beckmann affirmed.

Cardinal Donald Wuerl of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington, who planned to greet the Pope upon his arrival later in the day, declared that “it is the responsibility of religious leaders to speak the values of their religious tradition.”

Describing his own church’s efforts to alleviate poverty, Salvation Army U.S. National Commander David Jeffrey noted that their goal is to create lasting impact by helping parents help their children grow into successful adults.

“Our goal is to make a lasting difference in reducing intergenerational poverty across the United States by transforming the lives of 100,000 families by the year 2030,” Jeffrey explained.

“There are 800 million people around the world who will go to bed hungry every night until we commit not just to food assistance but to systems change, local, domestic and global,” added American Jewish World Service President Ruth Messinger.

  1. Comment by JustNTyme on September 22, 2015 at 8:09 pm

    In this interfaith endeavor, what religion does Katherine Schiori represent?

  2. Comment by Jeff Walton on September 23, 2015 at 9:41 am

    For the purposes of this Bread for the World statement, Bishop Jefferts Schori represents no one but herself. The organizations are listed for identification purposes. It’s “100 faith leaders” not “100 faith organizations.”

  3. Comment by Mike Ward on September 23, 2015 at 9:48 am

    This isn’t the church planning to end hunger. This is the church asking the government to end hunger and planning on taking credit for it.

  4. Comment by Jeff Walton on September 23, 2015 at 11:48 am

    Bingo. Bread for the World is an advocacy organization that lobbies the government. They don’t directly feed anyone themselves (sometimes they are confused with Food for the Hungry, which actually is an aid organization, but they are completely different organizations).

  5. Comment by MarcoPolo on September 24, 2015 at 7:45 pm

    Nonetheless, they advocate for the right cause.
    Why doesn’t it seem wise to steer monies that are allocated for Bombs that will likely NEVER be used?
    After all, the U.S. has an enormous budget for the Military. Why can’t 10% of THAT money be spent on projects of this importance? 800 Billion dollars is a lot of money to be spent on destructive armaments. Let’s turn this behemoth around, and start caring for our people!
    Great gathering of concerned Ministers! Hallelujah!
    Thanks for reporting this, Jeffrey!

  6. Comment by Asemodevs on September 25, 2015 at 12:21 pm

    Feed people yourself if you’re so compassionate. Forcing other people to do so is theft. Liberals are notoriously generous with other people’s money, extremely stingy with their own. It’s all faux compassion, nothing but words – “I care about the poor, so I’m a better person than conservatives!” Nothing but empty talk and blatant hypocrisy.

  7. Comment by MarcoPolo on September 25, 2015 at 12:27 pm

    I know MANY Liberal-Progressives that fund this kind of charity, and it’s not just a Party-line item of concern, it’s Humanitarian! And if you’re of the religious set, it’s an edict from the late great JC!

    So give me a better reason than that for not getting behind this program?

    Mercy, Compassion, et al!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The work of IRD is made possible by your generous contributions.

Receive expert analysis in your inbox.