Disciples of Christ Eye Convention Pullout to Protest Indiana Religious Liberty Law

on March 27, 2015

Institute on Religion and Democracy Press Release
March 27, 2015
Contact: Jeff Walton office: 202-682-4131, cell: 202-413-5639, e-mail: jwalton@TheIRD.org

 

“Religious freedom is the cornerstone of all liberty for all people. Deny or reduce it, and there are no ultimate limits on the state’s power to coerce.”
-IRD President Mark Tooley

 

Washington, DC—The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) denomination, based in Indianapolis, announced its governing convention may not meet in Indiana’s capital city after the state approved its own version of the longstanding federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

The Indianapolis Star describes the law as prohibiting “state or local governments from substantially burdening a person’s ability to exercise their religion — unless the government can show that it has a compelling interest and that the action is the least-restrictive means of achieving it.”

Other states have similar laws offering protection for religious minorities, the federal version passed over 20 years ago almost unanimously in Congress, signed into law by President Clinton.

The Disciples of Christ letter noted that 6000 are expected at its 2017 convention, representing over one percent of the total national membership of the denomination. The Disciples have lost about 70 percent of their membership, a higher percentage than any other Mainline denomination.

IRD President Mark Tooley commented:

“Protecting religious minorities has become hyper politically incorrect. Under the new zeitgeist of cultural and political demands, elderly inn owners must host polyamorous rites, nuns must subsidize condoms, and church groups should finance abortions. Otherwise, they are guilty of ‘discrimination,’ which has become the unforgivable sin, unless the targets of discrimination are religious traditionalists, who merit no rights.

“Why would even a hyper liberal denomination oppose religious freedom and free speech, labeling it ‘hatred’ and ‘bigotry?’

“Originally RFRA laws were intended to protected small religious groups from undue burdens on practicing their faith in public life. It was not imagined there would come a day when laws might seek to jail or financially destroy nuns, rabbis or Christian camp counselors who prefer to abstain from the next wave of sexual and gender experimentation. And there’s always a next wave, always more provocative than the previous, and always accompanied by a shrill chorus angrily berating any dissent.

“Religious freedom is the cornerstone of all liberty for all people. Deny or reduce it, and there are no ultimate limits on the state’s power to coerce.”

www.TheIRD.org

  1. Comment by Nick on March 27, 2015 at 3:18 pm

    I’ve never cried for this denomination, if only because their formal name — the Christian Church — infers all other Christian denominations are not in fact Christian.

  2. Comment by MarcoPolo on March 30, 2015 at 9:14 am

    We’ll see how this plays when a Muslim business owner refuses to serve a female customer who’s NOT wearing a burkha.
    See, this plays both ways!

The work of IRD is made possible by your generous contributions.

Receive expert analysis in your inbox.