June 20, 2014

PCUSA Votes For Anti-Israel Divestment

After a decade of heated debate, backtracking, and suspenseful votes, the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has once again voted for divestment from three companies that do business with Israel. The controversial vote is sure to inspire debate between proponents of divestment, who argue that it is necessary in light of Israel’s actions in the Palestinian territories, and opponents, who argue that divestment is one-sided, unhelpful, and driven by anti-Semitism.

The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A) has a long history of flirtation with the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement designed to place economic restrictions on the State of Israel. Back in 2004, the denomination voted in favor of divestment, but reversed itself two years later after an intense backlash. Since then, the PCUSA has considered divestment in every successive General Assembly. At the 2012 General Assembly held in Pittsburgh, divestment passed committee 36-11, but failed in the General Assembly by only two votes.

The vote Friday was almost extremely close. After a lengthy floor debate and amendment process, the measure, which called upon the PCUSA to divest from Caterpillar, Hewlett-Packard, and Motorola passed by a vote of only 310-303. In addition to the divestment measures, Item 04-04 also reiterates PCUSA support for a two-state solution and the existence of Israel. As a concession to divestment opponents, language was added to clarify that the PCUSA is not aligned with nor endorses the strategy of the global BDS movement.

The General Assembly vote comes after days of debate and anticipation. On Tuesday, the Middle East Issues Committee voted 45-20 to approve  Item 04-04, which ironically was originally a motion opposing divestment until it was amended by the committee. The Presbyterian Outlook reports that many on the committee raised concerns that the PCUSA would appear anti-Semitic or anti-Israel if it approved divestment. But the process was apparently marked by the ceaseless intervention” of denominational staff and “outside speakers urging them to divest.”

“Jesus did not mind telling the Jews when they were wrong,” said the committee’s vice moderator. “So why are we so fearful?”

The moderator of the Middle East Issues Committee then took to the assembly floor Thursday morning to defend the committee’s decision. Rev. Stephen Choi told the elders that the divestment recommendation was only one of nine recommendations in Item 04-04 and came after “years and years of our church’s attempt to engage these corporations in dialogues to change their practices and products.” He reiterated that divestment from the three companies would not mean divestment from Israel as a whole.

A representative of the Jewish community also spoke, asking elders to reject the motion. Rabbi Rick Jacobs from the Union of Reform Judaism called divestment an attempt to delegitimatize the very existence of Israel the threatened the possibility of a two-state solution. He promised that if the motion was rejected, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, PCUSA General Assembly leaders, and himself would meet in Jerusalem to hold talks. “If you choose partnership over divestment and BDS,” he said, “together we can change the world.”

A more positive development in Jewish-PCUSA relations was the passage of Item 04-10, which declares that the controversial PCUSA study guide Zionism Unsettled “does not represent the views of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)…” Zionism Unsettled was denounced by Jewish groups for its “biased hostility” to Israel, for portraying Israel as the sole instigator of all the problems in the Middle East and for accusing the nation of ethnic cleansing. Item 04-10 passed the Middle East Issues committee by a vote of 54-8 and passed the General Assembly via consent agenda, a process reserved for uncontroversial items.

On Thursday, the General Assembly voted to allow ministers to perform same-sex marriages where legal.“By overturning natural marriage the PCUSA is only accelerating its already fast-paced demise,” IRD president Mark Tooley said in response to that vote.


6 Responses to PCUSA Votes For Anti-Israel Divestment

  1. Mark McNeil says:

    See how the mighty have fallen.

  2. hamous says:

    Turning their backs on God and his people in two short days.

  3. Greg says:

    What a banner week for the PCUSA. How long before they implode?

  4. AharonHaLevi says:

    The PCUSA explanation for their divestment in corporations doing work in Israel is that the Israeli’s are supporting “non-peaceful pursuits” and raises suspicion that, for example, Caterpillar is not being targeted because its bulldozers are moving earth in Syria, but because they are used by the IDF. Likewise, Motorola and Hewlett-Packard are targets not because they sell cellphones and printers to Iran, but because they have large operations in Israel. Notice there has been zero initiatives on divesting in (many) companies manufacturing in China, which occupies and oppresses Tibet. Such double standards have a name – official, traditional, Christian anti-Semitism.

    Reverend Larry Grimm of the PCUSA hoped for a lot more than disinvestment in a few companies: Grimm let the “everyone would be better off if there were no Israel” cat out of the bag on his Facebook page: “America is the Promised Land. We all know this. Come to the land of opportunity. Quit feeling guilt about what you are doing in Palestine, Jewish friends. Stop it. Come home to America!” Bingo!

    The Mideast Committee also passed a resolution urging reconsideration of the Church’s support for a two-state solution, a position which certainly follows from Grimm’s view that there should be no Jewish state. Eliminating Jews is a tried and true antisemitic play.

  5. samboy3 says:

    It is very disturbing and sobering to realize that the evil that the leftist movement represents has no doubt infected our protestant denominations. Remember that in Oct 2012 the leader of the PCUSA was able to convince many other protestant leaders to sign-on to a letter requesting Congress defund the assistance we have been giving to the Israeli military effort to defend themselves. Don’t be surprised that now they will re-double their efforts to further punish Israel.

    From a theological point of view, who do we now pray to? We used to pray to the God of Israel. Who do we pray to now?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *