Opposing Tim Keller at Princeton Seminary

on March 18, 2017

There is some opposition to New York pastor Tim Keller speaking at Princeton Seminary on April 6 because his denomination doesn’t ordain women or LGBTQ people.  He belongs to the Presbyterian Church in America, a growing conservative denomination that dates to the 1970s. Keller is receiving The Abraham Kuyper Prize for Excellence in Reformed Theology and Public Life, which honors contributors to the “Neo-Calvinist vision of religious engagement.”

Keller, a prolific author and popular speaker, is founder of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in Manhattan, which has in turn planted many other new churches in New York.  This church network is notable for its success in attracting young urban professionals and for its racial diversity.  The popularity of these churches rebuts some stereotypes about secular New York City and about young adults.  The model of these churches and Keller’s writing have inspired countless other new church plants especially successful with young people in cities across America.  

Unfailingly thoughtful and cerebral, frequently appearing in secular media as a religious and cultural commentator, Keller is one of the most influential pastors and Christian thinkers in America today.  He is a guru of the rebirth of urban evangelical Protestant Christianity.  His theology like his denomination’s is orthodox and Reformed.  Keller typically avoids culture war issues and hot button debates.  He affirms traditional Christian sexual ethics and marriage teaching but rarely speaks about it.  His churches are full of New Yorkers who are socially liberal but drawn to his intellectually vibrant presentation of Christianity.

One Princeton graduate, a minister in the liberal Presbyterian Church (USA), has been quoted in The Christian Post denouncing Keller’s scheduled appearance at her alma mater in her blog, which declares:  

…An institution designed to train men and women for ministry shouldn’t be awarding fancy prizes to someone who believes half the student body (or is it more than half?) has no business leading churches. It’s offensive and, as I have taught my four and five year olds to express, it hurts my feelings. 

She also complains that “he (and the denomination he serves) is also very clear in its exclusion of LGBT people.”

Similarly, a Christian Century column derides Keller as:

…one of the loudest, most read, and most adhered-to proponents of male headship in the home. I am literally shaking with grief as I write this. I have spent years with women who have tried to de-program themselves after growing up in this baptized abuse.

This columnist associates Keller with sexual “complimentarianism,” which “means married women have no choice over their lives at all.” Parishioners at Keller’s Manhattan churches likely would be surprised by this assertion.  She concludes:

I hoped that my denomination would stand up for women, loud and clear. Instead we are honoring and celebrating a man who has championed toxic theology for decades.

Princeton Seminary President Craig Barnes, who formerly pastored a relatively conservative PCUSA congregation in Washington DC that doesn’t agree with its denomination on same sex marriage, has responded to criticism by explaining:

Our seminary embraces full inclusion for ordained leadership of the church. We clearly stand in prophetic opposition to the PCA and many other Christian denominations that do not extend the full exercise of Spirit filled gifts for women or those of various sexual orientations. 

Barnes further explained:

It is also a core conviction of our seminary to be a serious academic institution that will sometimes bring controversial speakers to campus because we refuse to exclude voices within the church. Diversity of theological thought and practice has long been a hallmark of our school. And so we have had a wide variety of featured speakers on campus including others who come from traditions that do not ordain women or LGBTQ+ individuals, such as many wings of the Protestant church, and bishops of the Orthodox and Roman Catholic communions.  So my hope is that we will receive Rev. Keller in a spirit of grace and academic freedom, realizing we can listen to someone with whom many, including me, strongly disagree about this critical issue of justice.

So good for Barnes that he defends academic freedom.  But how sad that he apparently no longer affirms traditional Christian teaching on marriage.  He references “many wings” of Protestantism that don’t share the PCUSA’s liberalism, plus Catholics and Orthodox.

This latter point merits elaboration.  Nearly all of global Christianity disagrees with the PCUSA and Princeton Seminary on these issues and would align with Keller, who is not exotic or unusual in his stances. Half the world’s Christians are Roman Catholic. Another ten percent or more are Orthodox. Most of the rest are conservative evangelical or Pentecostal. 

The PCUSA’s liberal perspective is largely confined to a handful of declining denominations in North America, northwest Europe and Australia and New Zealand, collectively including not more than two or three percent of global Christianity.  Much of global Protestant Christianity, including Methodism and parts of Anglicanism, plus Pentecostalism, ordains women.  But almost none dissents from orthodox teaching on marriage and sexual ethics.

The objectors to Keller speaking at Princeton would also, if consistent, have to object to the Pope and to the clerics of nearly every major Christian body.  They of course would also have to exclude,  by the same standards, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Shintoists, and almost every major religion.

Although its celebrants often don’t realize it, the universe of liberal Protestantism is very small and getting smaller.  Keller will speak at Princeton on church planting, and hopefully he will be heard.

  1. Comment by feslop on March 18, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    My wife and I are PTS graduates, both ordained, I in the UM church and she in the ABC. My great grandparents were converted at a revival meeting preached by a Free Methodist female evangelist around 1900, and from that 13 clergy, including 4 females by direct blood kinship or marriage have preached the gospel. I am delighted authentic diversity is respected at PTS by Keller’s presence. As a military chaplain I recall numerous instances when chaplain colleagues from faith traditions that did not ordain women (Protestant AND Catholic) either invited my wife to preach or gladly and graciously participated in worship services where they knew she would be preaching. Early in his classic sermon, “Shall the Fundamentalists Win,” Harry Emerson Fosdick drew a distinction between conservatives (traditionalist in faith) and fundamentalists, noting that true conservatives could give liberals lessons in true liberality of spirit. It’s teaching time. Keller has been no divisive culture warrior for contentions issues, and is not defined primarily by what he is against. And if I recall correctly, Redeemer Church has more weekend worshippers than virtually every Presbyterian (or United Methodist) church in all the boroughs…combined. Redeemer apparently does not even own a smoke machine for sauced-up worship. If I as a convinced Wesleyan Arminian can write this about an unrepentant Calvinist, well, the Kingdom of God is at hand.

  2. Comment by John E on March 18, 2017 at 2:29 pm

    Thank you for the additional information about Rev. Fosdick, who sounds more positive about traditional Christians than I thought he was.

  3. Comment by Vae Victis on March 21, 2017 at 11:27 am

    Redeemer – of which I am a member – also helps plant non-PCA churches, including Wesleyan churches. We even had a husband and wife who were co-pastors of a new Wesleyan church speak briefly during the church service about their new plant. Keller is hardly a divisive figure…

  4. Comment by David Martin on April 18, 2017 at 2:23 pm

    It’s as you say, Feslop; Pastor Keller’s ministry to his church, and now to the world via his writing, is defined by the deepest and most profound preaching of the Gospel.
    His (and others in the PCA) preaching on the scope and depth of the Kingdom would overwhelm even the most theologically liberal Union grad.

  5. Comment by apriluser on March 18, 2017 at 11:31 pm

    Great response by PTS president. He is modeling that disagreement does not have to lead to disenfranchisement of Keller.

  6. Comment by Sarah Murray Eremic on March 23, 2017 at 5:01 pm

    Although I admire his response allowing Keller’s lecture to go forward, he DID withdraw the Kuyper award already announced. This action does NOT represent who Kuyper was, thus quite ironic.

  7. Comment by apriluser on March 24, 2017 at 1:06 pm

    Understood. I posted the comment before the award was rescinded.
    Such a shame. PTS is my husband’s alma mater.

  8. Comment by Jackell on March 19, 2017 at 11:29 am

    The “so-called” academic community affiliated with university “higher learning” seems to be more closed minded than any other institution in our society. It may be a sign of their eventual demise.

  9. Comment by Jimmy on March 22, 2017 at 1:16 am

    When Tim Keller is labeled a, “controversial figure” we can clearly see just how insane things are at PTS.

  10. Comment by johnschuh on March 31, 2017 at 1:33 am

    Well, Christianity IS controversial.

  11. Comment by David Goudie on March 22, 2017 at 1:52 pm

    Honest question. Has Timothy Keller ever said anything about women in ministry? … I ask because I’ve read and listened to a number of his books, sermons, talks and never once heard him say anything about that particular subject. Now granted he may have, and he may even hold a different view than I (I affirm women in ministry), even then as pointed out, it would be crazy and I dare say ‘intolerant’ to keep him from speaking on those bases alone. I ask though, for it seems even crazier to me because I’ve never heard him once speak about women in ministry.

  12. Comment by apriluser on March 24, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    I think it is because of the PCA’s position on women in ministry.

  13. Comment by johnschuh on March 31, 2017 at 1:34 am

    If you are not with some people, you are considered against them. They are in desperate need of affirmation.

  14. Comment by JWinter777 on April 1, 2017 at 9:10 pm

    Frankly, most pastors in the PCUSA, EPC, ECO, PCA, OPC, Bible Presbyterian, Cumberland Presbyterian, Reformed Presbyterian can’t hold a candle to the “success” Tim Keller experienced during his years at Redemeer Presbyterian. There is jealousy in the ranks. In my years of ministry in the PCUSA, pastors weren’t rewarded for church growth. More attention was given to inept pastors who drove their respective church into the ground. It’s easier to turn Tim Keller away from PTS than to have him come to the seminary where some students and professors will realize they really don’t have what it takes to lead and preach a Gospel that changes lives and advances the Kingdom.

  15. Comment by Meg on May 17, 2017 at 8:05 am

    Tim and Kathy Keller made it clear at the TGC Conference 2014 that they are both Biblically convinced complimentarians – the best kind as they were once egalitarians but began to study the Word and, well, the rest is history. Very disappointed in where Barnes has gone doctrinally as he has and is descending the slippery slope. Out of all of this, many more will read and listen to Keller and through that read and hear truth preached.

  16. Comment by Chuck on February 1, 2018 at 5:32 pm

    “This columnist associates Keller with sexual “complimentarianism,” which “means married women have no choice over their lives at all.”

    Pardon my French but Holy Cow! What a gross misrepresentation of complementarianism! It’s one thing to disagree with Tim Keller on any given position but to speak so disparagingly and untruthfully of a Christ-follower as Tim Keller is reckless to say the least.

The work of IRD is made possible by your generous contributions.

Receive expert analysis in your inbox.