Eastern Pennsylvania UMC Evangelicals Respond to Mass Covenant Breaking

on November 8, 2013

As we reported earlier, a group of Eastern Pennsylvania United Methodist clergy (the number has now climbed to 35) have publicly announced their plans to jointly co-officiate at a same-sex union blessing service this Saturday, in direct violation of the UMC church policies they vowed to uphold.

This publicity stunt is being done to protest the November 18 church trial of Rev. Frank Schaefer, another United Methodist minister in the area being charged with performing another same-sex union service.

This Saturday’s service will be held at Arch Street UMC in Philadelphia, with the strongly expressed support of that congregation’s pastors, Robin Hynicka and David Brown, and lay leadership.  That congregation is formally affiliated with the libertine Reconciling Ministries Network (RMN), which is also in violation of church law.

The UMC Book of Discipline clearly states: “Ceremonies that celebrate homosexual unions shall not be conducted by our ministers and shall not be conducted in our churches.” Everyone who chooses to be ordained into the United Methodist Church makes an explicit covenant with God and our church that they will “support and maintain” this policy.

The area’s bishop, Peggy Johnson, asked the group of mass-covenant-breaking clergy and representatives of the Eastern Pennsylvania Evangelical Connection (an evangelical caucus group in that annual conference) to meet and pray with her, in an apparent attempt to head off the impending crisis.  The evangelicals agreed but the covenant breakers refused.

Here is the public statement the Eastern Pennsylvania Evangelical Connection released at the start of this month:


A Call to Accountability

Recently it was announced that 31 local United Methodist clergy are planning to conduct a same-sex wedding in our region this month. Such a ceremony is contrary to the stated position of our global United Methodist Church, and is specifically prohibited by church law as outlined in our Book of Discipline. Our Church’s declarations that “the practice of homosexuality… [is] incompatible with Christian teaching,” and that “sexual relations are affirmed only with the covenant of monogamous, heterosexual marriage” (161F), are consistent with the definition of marriage offered to us by Jesus Christ in Matthew 19, and with the worldwide consensus of the Christian Church for 2,000 years.

The immediate question before us, however, is not that of sexuality but of accountability, community and integrity. In ordination, every United Methodist minister enters into a solemn covenant with fellow clergy and the laity, and vows to abide by our rules. The right to dissent from those rules and work to change them is unquestioned. But those entrusted with ordination have no right to break those rules unilaterally in their official roles, or seek to do so without consequence.

We have a process we call “holy conferencing,” in which representatives and leaders of our church meet regularly at the local, regional and global levels to prayerfully discuss and debate difficult issues, set policies, and enact rules that govern our common life. This process is public, democratic, and always open to revisiting questions previously decided. This process represents the common covenant that binds us together, and holds us accountable to one another.

Having failed thus far to persuade our church through its process of holy conferencing to change its teachings, these 31 clergy have chosen to break their covenant with fellow clergy and the laity of the United Methodist Church. They have also made it clear that their intended action is designed to paralyze our system of accountability, and render our Book of Discipline inoperable, by placing impossible strains on the financial and human resources of our community. We grieve over the potential of this intended action to threaten the very fabric of our unity.

We implore these colleagues to reconsider their intended course; to consider the grave harm it will inflict on the covenant that binds us together as United Methodists; and to reflect on the irreparable damage it will render to trust, community, and collegiality among us.

We further call upon our bishop and all our fellow United Methodists in Eastern Pennsylvania to reaffirm their commitment to our common covenant, to pray for these dissatisfied brothers and sisters, and to work to maintain both the unity and integrity of our beloved Church.

  1. Comment by gary on November 9, 2013 at 12:10 pm

    I realize that pastors are human beings and they are not perfect by any stretch of the imagination but when you take an oath before God and your denominational leaders to uphold the church doctrine and you then break that oath doesn’t that make you a liar? Isn’t there a commandment about that?

  2. Comment by Jarrod Johnston on November 10, 2013 at 8:25 am

    I think a reasonable outcome on all of this would be that at GC2016 the UMC finally deals away with wishy-washy terminology regarding our gay brothers and sisters. Hate the sin doesn’t work. One way or the other the UMC needs to take a real stand and then people can decide on which side they should fall. It’s time.

    Occurrences like the one you are lamenting will only increase from here.

  3. Comment by gary on November 11, 2013 at 1:51 pm

    well they went ahead and did what they said they were going to do. will be interesting to see the response from from the council of bishops. I see a slap on the wrist coming.

  4. Comment by Dean Snyder on November 15, 2013 at 6:05 pm


  5. Comment by Bishop Andrew Gerales Gentry on November 15, 2013 at 10:10 pm

    If you vow to observe then observe or leave. If you leave then proclaim. If you proclaim then embrace the witness of such proclamation. Stand with or against but stand!

The work of IRD is made possible by your generous contributions.

Receive expert analysis in your inbox.