Billy Graham Against the Machine

on October 21, 2013

In Billy Graham’s most recent interview, the 95 year old Evangelist was asked about our increasingly techno-centric culture and if there was a biblical view of technology. His response is worth considering:

“We have certainly watched the plethora of communication capabilities explode as we moved into the 21st century. I have always loved the art of communication, and there is no question that my preaching ministry benefited greatly by utilizing amplification and magnification in arenas and stadiums around the world. Television and radio enabled the gospel to reach far corners of the earth, as the Bible predicted. But while God allows blessing to come from such grand inventions like wireless and mobile devices, Satan has also used technology to cleverly advance his deception. There are generations today that take pride in their ability to communicate instantly through Facebook or Twitter but are unable to communicate face-to-face. People are finding solace sitting in front of computer screens willing to talk to total strangers about anything and everything through electronic communication, but don’t believe God could ever hear their cries of loneliness, grief, and pain.”

The evangelist concluded by saying “technology is a gift from God when it is used to proclaim the gospel.”

The point that Graham makes is a serious obstacle for Christians seeking to engage the world. We are seeking to save people’s souls, and we look into the soul of a person by looking into their face. All too often our faces and theirs are turned away and enveloped in a screen. Christians are as guilty of living techno-centric lives as much as the culture at large.

Conservatives, myself included, often embrace the fallacy that people today are somehow more depraved than they ever have been. Even though it true that the times have been much better, it is also true that the times have been much worse. Johnny Cash, another great southerner who appeared with Billy Graham on occasion, and who friends and I have affectionately dubbed the Aquinas of country music, said in his autobiography, “I simply don’t buy the concept of ‘Generation X’ as the ‘lost generation.’ I see too many good kids out there, kids who are ready and willing to do the right thing… Their distractions are greater, though. There’s no more simple life with simple choices for the young.”

The true obstacle for Christians today is not worse people, but people with more distractions, and before we can effectively speak to this problem we must recognize that we often suffer and submit to the same distractions. We live in a world of constant noise, and we often forget that God is encountered through a still small voice. Any model of Christian Civic engagement for the next century will have to take this into account and develop a theology of technology. C.S. Lewis, Roger Scruton, and Popes Paul VI and Benedict XVI, among others, have already laid much of the groundwork.

G.K. Chesterton once claimed of his views on technology that, “I am not a fanatic; and I think that machines may be of considerable use in destroying machinery.” His wit, as always, contains a truth – we must either use machines to pierce the barrier they have created, or we must attempt to show the world glimpses of the beauty that is now obscured. Chesterton went on to explain this attitude we must adopt:

“I am inclined to conclude that it is quite right to use the existing machines in so far as they do create a psychology that can despise machines, but not if they create a psychology that respects them. The Ford car is an excellent illustration of the question. If possessing a Ford car means rejoicing in a Ford car, it is melancholy enough… But if possessing a Ford car means rejoicing in a field of corn or clover, in a fresh landscape and a free atmosphere, it may be the beginning of many things – and even the end of many things. It may, for instance, be the end of the car and the beginning of the cottage. Thus we might almost say the final triumph of Mr. Ford is not when the man gets into the car, but when he enthusiastically falls out of the car… The man who used his car to find his farm will be more interested in the farm than in the car; certainly more interested than in the shop where he once bought the car.”

The point that Graham and Chesterton are trying to tell us is that technology is only good when it is being used to point to something more worthy beyond it. When it become the center of our lives and culture we have gone amiss and abused the gifts given to us. I must confess this is an issue that has been convicting me of late. I encourage you, the next time you find yourself surrounded by people, to attempt and break through the technological barrier that we all build around ourselves. After all, why stare at a screen when the image of God is right next to you?

  1. Comment by Joyce Hatfield on October 21, 2013 at 10:24 pm

    Brian,
    What an excellent article. I wish there were more young men out there like you! Your mama has every right to be proud of you!
    Joyce Hatfield
    PCC Nursing Faculty (and a friend of Aunt Teresa!)

  2. Comment by Sam Cannon on October 22, 2013 at 12:27 pm

    I see a blockage to defining man’s good spirit in terms of “Christian” because it is bigger than that. There must be a way to connect people through a “healing spirit” that is above our names for it. For example, Abraham Maslow was a healer and good worker for the “spirit” but was an athiest trying to define “good spirit.” The only thing he missed was pointing his “Famous Hierarchy” toward the sky rather than the ground, but his definition of “Eupsychian Capitalism” at UncleAbe.blogspot.com speaks to Christians as well. I guess my beef here is that Christians are a vector to something beyond that man-made definition. Something like that.

  3. Comment by Sam Cannon on October 22, 2013 at 12:34 pm

    I should have sent my comment from this e-mail.

  4. Comment by Sam Cannon on October 22, 2013 at 12:39 pm

    It has been said, “Beauty is vanishing from our world because we live as though it did not matter.” But look at Maslow’s B-values, where “Beauty” is on a pedestal.

    It’s our sensitivity to the higher values that counts, because that’s our best defense against the anomie that haunts us.

    Sure glad you moderate these. Please clean up for me. Thanks.

  5. Comment by Sam Cannon on October 22, 2013 at 12:44 pm

    Real world example: Google “Naamitapiikoan” and note in your mind what they mean is “sky.” He missed the spiritual aspects: “You don’t grow a tree from the top.” See how the “Famous Triangle” blocks good works? If it were upside down, it would be a better guide for all of us.

  6. Comment by Sam Cannon on October 22, 2013 at 1:10 pm

    Real World Example: A fellow Southerner, William Faulkner speaks to the same notion in a secular way, but speaks to Christians as well as others endowed with what makes man unique among creatures:

    Maslow.org/audio/faulkner.mp3

  7. Comment by Sam Cannon on October 22, 2013 at 1:47 pm

    All the machine needs is a Universal Quote of the Day.

  8. Comment by FAMiniter on October 22, 2013 at 8:54 pm

    I am really curious as to when and where this interview took place, who was present and how it was recorded and transmitted to the author of the article. It has seemed for some years now that Billy Graham has been getting the Howard Hughes treatment. Then when I read the style of what he is alleged to have said – at 95 – I get even more suspicious.

The work of IRD is made possible by your generous contributions.

Receive expert analysis in your inbox.