Tyler Wigg-Stevenson’s Advice for Christian Activists

on June 13, 2013
(Photo Credit: Jonathan Merritt)
(Photo Credit: Jonathan Merritt)

Kristin Rudolph (@Kristin_Rudolph)

As a young generation of activist-minded, idealistic evangelicals confronts the brokenness and frustration of the real world, Tyler Wigg-Stevenson is calling for a “calibration check” to determine what it means for Christians to “have a faithful commitment to doing good.” In the first of a new webcast series from Q Ideas, Wigg-Stevenson told Q founder and president Gabe Lyons he sees “a generation of Christians really who are thinking seriously about cultural renewal [and] … the common good.”

Wigg-Stevenson, a pastor and founder of the nuclear abolition group, Two Futures Project, said “there’s been a real surge in what I’d call Christian activism over the last ten years.” He explained “the work’s harder than we initially thought it might be,” which demands serious consideration of what it means “to live out our faith in public.” To consider these questions, Wigg-Stevenson wrote The World is Not Ours to Save: Finding the Freedom to Do Good, which was released this year.

The author said the idea of “progress and that we are just slowly but surely we’re building a better world and it’s irreversible” cannot be reconciled with a Christian understanding of the world and history. “Part of the progressive vision … is that we’re building into the future. But it doesn’t necessarily have an answer for how you deal with the past,” Wigg-Stevenson explained. He continued: “One of the things I think is so troublesome from a Christian perspective is that [a progressive vision] just cannot make sense of the irreversible tragedy of history that there are people and cultures who have been ground under … and they are not retrievable.”

“As Christians we have to think that history needs more than an oil change. History needs redemption and that’s part of a Christian understanding of salvation,” Wigg-Stevenson stated. He cautioned activists that the world is “tragically shot through with sin and that requires a Redeemer … so our response to history is not to get in and tinker with it until it’s okay, our response to history is to be faithful to the only One whose entry into history is its solution.”

“American Christianity, especially American evangelicalism is so pragmatic, so practical,” Wigg-Stevenson explained, that it often loses sight of its primary commitment to Christ and takes a “problem solving” approach that leaves little room to lament the incurable brokenness of our world. Further, he said “first and foremost our call is to fidelity [to Christ] and in some places fidelity looks like being effective,” but “fidelity isn’t always effective.”

Wigg-Stevenson pointed out how American evangelicals have downplayed the role of peace in Christianity, as they “are not super comfortable with the peace movement coming out of the Vietnam era as being something sort of culturally and morally suspicious. I think we need to get over that allergy to peace because peace is shot through the Bible.”

He pointed to Micah chapter four, which describes the “the mountain of the Lord’s temple will be established … and peoples will stream to it” in peace during the last days. Wigg-Stevenson said “the kingdom is quite obviously not here yet … [and] the ‘mountain of the temple of the Lord,’ from a Christian interpretation of Micah, is the mountain of the cross. That’s where Christ, whose own body became the temple of God, that’s where he was crucified and died for our sin.”

He explained that “every place where … Christ is exalted in every heart and in every community will start to see effects that look like what’s outlined in Micah, [though] they might be small.” A primary orientation toward Christ as Redeemer is the essential foundation of all good work, the pastor advised. Lyons agreed, adding: “these glimpses of the kingdom are the way that the world starts to know there is a better way [to live].”

Activist minded evangelicals would do well to heed Wigg-Stevenson’s advice. It is easy to lose sight of the Christian’s primary call to love God while pouring one’s life into a worthy cause. To do so results at best in burn out, at worst idolatry, and even worse, both. While evangelicals are rightly concerned with addressing the world’s brokenness, a sober approach to activism grounded in Christ’s ultimate redemptive work is true faithfulness.

  1. Comment by Jane L. Bonner on June 13, 2013 at 9:16 am

    The activism of Jesus was peaceful in that He walked it out with love of God and related that to love of neighbor. Loving ones neighbor is not done in a hurry of self actualization. Meditation and study of God’s Holy Word prepares us to walk that path and not forge our own based on the world’s standards and definitions. I am often dismayed to see Christian activists with no thorough grasp of the Great Commandment and a greater obsession with what is now called “social justice” with no regard for the foundational principles of God’s revelation.

  2. Comment by Dean Allen on June 13, 2013 at 9:28 am

    Tyler Wigg Stevenson may be a well intended young man. However, his ignorance of national security is simply abysmal. At our 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, one of the delegates proposed to limit the size of the future United States Army to no more than 5,000 men. General George Washington sarcastically proposed an amendment to also limit the size of any invading army to the same 5,000. Mercifully, the proposal died.

    A couple of thousand years ago when a Roman emperor wanted to know how to preserve the peace, he was told “Si vis pacem para bellum.” That is the only correct prescription. History has proven over and over that disarmament is always seen by adversaries as weakness. Disarmament always leads to war and has never produced the intended peaceful world.

    The only nations who survive without adequate defense are those small nations whose effective defense is provided by some larger superpower protecting them. Thus small Caribbean and Latin American nations survive quite nicely because of the Monroe Doctrine, or because they are part of the British Commonwealth of nations.

    Tyler needs to look at recent American history as a guide. President Jimmy Carter gutted the American defense establishment and the result was a third world nation taking our diplomats hostage for 444 days. Ronald Reagan built a 600 ship Navy, increased weapons systems of all types and started the Strategic Defense Initiative.

    What was the result of Ronald Reagan’s most massive military buildup since World War II? Peace through strength works, the Soviet Union collapsed.

    Tyler, as a Pastor, you need to go back and read scripture. . . there will be wars and rumors of wars till the end of time.

    Respectfully,

    Dean Allen

The work of IRD is made possible by your generous contributions.

Receive expert analysis in your inbox.