Tags
abortifacient, contraceptive, Institute on Religion and Democracy, Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance, IRD Blog, Kathleen Sebelius, Obamacare mandate, religious liberty
About 150 religious leaders, in a June 11 letter, told U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius of their “grave concern” about the creation of a “two-class concept of religious organizations” that Obamacare regulators created to determine which religious groups must subsidize contraceptives and abortifacients and which may not. They wrote:
“We we are united in opposition to the creation in federal law of two classes of religious organizations: churches—considered sufficiently focused inwardly to merit an exemption and thus full protection from the mandate; and faith-based service organizations—outwardly oriented and given a lesser degree of protection.”
They pointed out that “both worship-oriented and service-oriented religious organizations are authentically and equally religious organizations.” And they denied “that it is within the jurisdiction of the federal government to define, in place of religious communities, what constitutes true religion and authentic ministry.”
These religious leaders complained to Sebelius that “this two-class scheme protects those religious organizations focused on activities directed inward to a worship community while offering little religious freedom protection to the many religious organizations that engage in service directed outward. The scheme honors acts of worship while burdening those whose faith leads them to service in our common life.”
The religious leaders implored Sebelius to “eliminate the two-class scheme of religious organization” and to “extend to faith-based service organizations the same exemption that the regulations currently limit to churches.” They concluded: “Secretary Sebelius, please restore the federal government’s full respect for faith-based educational, social-service, and health organizations as authentic vehicles for religious service.”

The letter was organized by Stanley Carlson-Thies, President of the Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance.
Prominent evangelical signers included:
Sandra C. Gray, President, Asbury University
Steve Cramer, President, Bethel College
James H Barnes III, President , Bethel University
Kenneth D. Hunn, Executive Director, The Brethren Church
David Neff, Editor in chief, Christianity Today
David Wilson, General Secretary, Church of the Nazarene
Phil Whipple, Bishop, Church of the United Brethren in Christ
Ronald J. Sider, President, Evangelicals for Social Action
Richard J. Mouw, President, Fuller Theological Seminary
Kenneth A. Smith, President, Geneva College
Leith Anderson, President, National Association of Evangelicals
Galen Carey, Vice President, Government Relations , National Association of Evangelicals
Samuel Rodriguez, President, National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference
Commissioner William A. Roberts, National Commander, The Salvation Army – USA
Stephan J. Bauman, President/CEO, World Relief
Richard Stearns, President, World Vision, Inc.
So, according the above signees, if a religious organization believes that women should be paid less to do the same job, that organization should be exempt from labor laws regarding equal pay in their businesses?
Really, the entire statement is an embarassment to believers in the First Amendement.
Well, done, Stanley!!!