Object Lesson

Tags

, , , , , ,

A baby bat, not much bigger than the one on our step. (Photo credit: Animals of the Planet Earth website)

A baby bat, not much bigger than the one on our step.
(Photo credit: Animals of the Planet Earth website)

By Faith J. H. McDonnell (@Cuchulain09)

I saw the small black object out of the corner of my eye as we approached the step. I assumed it was more trash left by one of the unruly children that live noisily above our heads. Either that, or it was some wet leaves or a clump of mulch. After all, we had rain for about three days in a row. I avoided that part of the step and continued on.

But teenage daughter Fiona had stopped to investigate further. ”It’s a baby bat!” she exclaimed. “Poor little thing.”

“Are you sure?” I asked. I returned down the steps and took a closer look. She was right. I saw a perfect little head with tiny pointed ears, delicate, wide-spread wings, and tiny legs. “Poor little thing,” I echoed.

Fiona said that she should bury the little bat. “Really?” I demanded. I couldn’t imagine touching the thing. I preferred to forget about it.

“Don’t you think I should?” she questioned.

“Well, if you don’t bury it, you can be sure that somebody — probably one of the kids upstairs — will end up stepping on it,” I admitted.

That clinched it. She went off in search of something with which to pick up the tiny mammal. “Not a kitchen utensil,” I begged. Luckily she found a plastic paint spatula and disappeared out the door with it. A few minutes later, and the baby bat had joined the two frogs, three salamanders, and a mollusk buried under the bushes that lined the front of our front porch.

I’ve been thinking about the whole event since then. Mostly, I am happy not to see any bats. But looking for a baby bat photo to accompany this blog post, I could see how intricately they are created – as a marvel of aerodynamics and ultrasonic sounds. Some of them are cute.

I still don’t have an affinity for bats, but it makes me happy that Fiona took the time to see what was on the step and cared about the dignity of something that was less than a square inch in size, but that had contained life.

One of God’s Creatures, Dead and Buried

A small mound of
Freshly turned dirt:
Another grave below our front patio.
Where others saw
A sodden black leaf or
Some undecipherable object,
Or saw nothing at all,
Fiona recognized a tiny, perfect
Baby bat, lying dead on the steps.
How could the rest of us
Have missed the delicate outstretched wings,
A miniature angel?
Only the eyes of one who has buried carefully
Two frogs, three salamanders, and a mollusk
In that impromptu cemetery
Where dignity has been assigned,
Could see.

Faith McDonnell, June 17, 2013

Shane Claiborne on ‘Wounded Healers’

Tags

, ,

claiborne

Photo Credit: NBC Philadelphia

By Aaron Gaglia (@GagliaAC)

“Every time we gather [for Communion], we gather around a victim of violence who had wounds to show it. And yet triumphed over violence without mirroring it. But triumphed over hatred with love,” preached Philadelphia urban activist and author Shane Claiborne in a chapel service at United Methodist-affiliated Duke University.

On April 7, Claiborne gave a sermon entitled, “Wounded Healers” in Durham, NC.

Building off the Gospel reading of the day, Claiborne focused on Jesus’ wounds and his identity as suffering Messiah with scars to show for it.

Pitting the idea of Jesus as a sufferer against “triumphalist militant” ideas of Jesus, Claiborne quoted Seattle Pastor Mark Driscoll ridiculing the “hippie” Jesus of our day and lauding the “violent” Jesus of Revelation.

Claiborne countered that while the film “Fight Club” might not be a bad movie, it is a “real bad theology.”

“The Jesus that we see was one who did suffer, who was wounded, and who looked those that were torturing him in the face and said, ‘Forgive them, for they don’t know what they are doing,’” Claiborne explained. “To follow this Christ means that we identify with the suffering people of our world … the victims.”

Driscoll does not emphasize the meek and suffering aspects of Jesus, trivializing Jesus’ wrath as blood thirst in the “violent” quote. Pacifist Claiborne is diametrically opposed, not adequately addressing the judgment and wrath of Jesus that will be revealed at His Second Coming. Jesus came non-violently and died so that mankind would be reconciled to God. Ever patient, Jesus longs for repentance and a decision follow Him. Yet there will come a time when those who would not repent will have to suffer the consequences of their sins—they will have to experience the wrath of Jesus.

Building on the scar motif, Claiborne challenged the notion that love forgets.

“I think that this is what this Gospel is about … that the wounds were still there,” Claiborne interpreted. “Even though love forgives, it doesn’t mean that love forgets.”

The author of “Jesus for President” offered the example of the Rwandan genocide and the great healing God is doing there to drive this point home.

“When we see that Christ suffered as we suffered, that Christ bleeds with those who bleed, it invites us to come alongside the victims,” Claiborne asserted.

Claiborne reported the city of Philadelphia’s recent ban on handing out food to the homeless. Claiborne and other Christians protested these bans. After rallying and testifying before court, the ban was eventually repealed as unconstitutional because of a religious freedom violation.

The inner city resident also addressed gun violence. With almost one homicide a day in Philadelphia and 10,000 a year in the United States, Claiborne identified gun deaths as a great problem. Claiborne briefly mentioned two victims of gun violence, a 6-month-old baby in Chicago, and a 19 year old who was killed on Claiborne’s front steps.

“There comes a time where it’s not just a debate around gun control, but it’s an issue of what it means to love our neighbor as ourselves,” Claiborne charged.

In response to gun violence, Claiborne’s the Simple Way community has held Good Friday services outside of retailers whose firearms were later linked to crimes. As they reflected on Jesus’ suffering and the hope of life he offers, one mother of a victim said she realized God understood her because His son was a victim of violence.

Gun control is a thorny issue and though reducing the issue to loving our neighbor as ourselves may be helpful, it does not solve the issue. Faithful Christians on both sides of the debate disagree on what it means to love our neighbor in regards to gun violence since they have radically different views on the effects of the legalization of guns.

Displaying a cross fashioned from a bullet and used at a children’s Easter service, Claiborne explained how the cross connects violence that happened to Jesus to the violence of today.

Like much of Claiborne’s work, the sermon message contains wisdom, yet over-politicizes rather than emphasizing the Gospel’s main point. Christians are to walk in solidarity with Christ and with those who suffer. In times of need, we can turn to Christ as one who knows what we are going through and who will help us, since he suffered here one earth. Yet the only reason we can turn to Christ is because he forgave us of our sins. The cross of Christ was not merely the overturning of a system of violence, but the payment of the price for our sins so that we would not have to suffer the consequences. The cross is not merely an example of sacrificial love and forgiveness, but is the supernatural means by which we can show sacrificial love and forgiveness. Through Jesus’ death and resurrection, our sinful flesh is crucified and we are resurrected as a new man who shows the prodigal love of Jesus. Though the cross provides an inspiring example of suffering, the essence of the cross is found in its life giving power.

Clear Principles for Messy Politics

Tags

, , , , , ,

Preaching

Equipping young Christians for public service.

By Luke Moon (@lukemoon1)

Years ago my vision was pretty simple: Train and equip young Christians in developing nations to effectively serve in public office or civil society.  As a missionary for 10 years I had trained and equipped hundreds if not thousands of young Christians for all kinds of righteous activities.  Whether it was teaching inductive Bible Study to a group of young pastors in an underground seminary in China, leading teams of young evangelicals to trace the human trafficking routes through Europe, or hiring a butcher to help me demonstrate the Old Testament sacrificial system I always aimed to be practical and relevant.  But politics is messy and mission agencies, often rightly, avoid training people for a vocation in politics. Even the agency I served with would talk about vocation and bringing transformation to education or Hollywood, but rarely was there talk of bringing transformation public service or civil society.

This avoidance of politics entirely understandable.  Politics is wrought with divisiveness, unhealthy alignments, and countless unforeseen pitfalls.  Mission agencies have found temporary safety in a handful of consensus issues like fighting human trafficking or providing clean water and mosquito nets. But what about more complicated issues like poverty, war, and marriage?  Are there biblical principles for how Christians should engage politics and public service?  Over the last five years I have developed a 15 hour lecture series that I think answers that very question.

While the lecture series includes a variety of topics and give special attention to relevant issues in the community, it consists of five major themes.

Theme 1. Politics is more than just Right vs. Left, Republican vs. Democrat, or Labor vs. Tory. Politics is largely about how people live together and structure their community.

Theme 2. There are a variety of political structures outlined in scripture.  From self-government in the Garden of Eden to the Kingdom of Heaven as described in the book of Revelation, government has always been part of God’s plan for humanity.

Theme 3.  Jesus was not an apolitical figure.  A King in his own right, Jesus confronted the major political structures in Israel.

Theme 4.  The Church has a long and complicated relationship with civil government.  The three standout models which have emerged recently are Catholic Social Teaching, Principled Pluralism, and Anabaptist. Each model offers a unique understanding to how Christians engage public service.

Theme 5.  Scripture offers a framework for human flourishing and therefore public policy advocated by Christians should seek that as well.

Since leaving full-time ministry and coming to work at the IRD, I have come to realize how important it is for Christians to understand the role of the Church in society and how it engages with the State.  I am inundated daily with examples of Christians confusing social justice gimmicks with life-changing Christ-centered community transformation.  Sadly, it seems much of the teaching in church that is geared towards young Christians tends to emphasize social justice that rarely leads to the heart change.  My lecture series puts social justice in the right context and with the right understanding.

I have taught this seminar all around the world, but never in Africa.  Last month, I received an invitation to teach this seminar in Mali.  This invitation was unique because in 2008 I helped train a group of students from Mali, and since then every attempt to set-up a training event in Mali has been forced to cancel due to numerous tragic circumstances (one reason being a civil war).  It is also unique in that I need to cover all my travel expenses. The recent civil war weighs heavy on the nation and I pray that the Lord with use this seminar and these young Christians to bring hope and healing to the nation of Mali.

If you would like to contribute to this project you can donate here. Please include “For Mali” in the note section of our online donation page.

Peter Storey to Florida Methodists: “No Americanism for You!”

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Peter Storey with Archbishop Desmond Tutu (Photo Credit: Duke Divinity School)

Peter Storey with Nelson Mandela (Photo Credit: Duke Divinity School)

by Barton Gingerich (@bjgingerich)

During last week’s Florida United Methodist Annual Conference, the unofficial Methodist Federation for Social Action (MFSA) featured Peter Storey as speaker for its simultaneous events. Storey is the former president of the autonomous Methodist Church of Southern Africa, past president of the South African Council of Churches, and served as the Methodist Bishop of the Johannesburg/Soweto area for 13 years. He garnered fame for courageously fighting against apartheid, authored several books, and taught courses at United Methodism’s Duke Divinity School, where he is professor emeritus. A champion for liberal nonviolence and Social Gospel activism, Storey found a receptive audience with the MFSA and its fellow liberal church activists.

During the MFSA banquet, Professor Storey lectured on “God and Caesar.” “Clearly social action and United Methodism are inseparable,” he concluded, “Truly you can’t talk about being a Methodist without being engaged in social action.”

Storey seemed especially worried about America, claiming that he had great sensitivity to social matters since he endured under “an oppressive totalitarian regime in my own country.” “Those atrocities that occurred on 9/11 did something to the nerve of the church in this country,” he surmised. He mused, “The church did its pastoral duty to a shocked nation. The church held the nation’s hand, but the politicians made up the nation’s mind.” Nevertheless, he excoriated  “a particularly shallow President of the United States” for framing the “theological narrative… It was simple (as you could well suspect): they’re evil and we’re good.” “Sometime after that, questions became treasonous. It somehow became unpatriotic to question this narrative in any way,” Story explained.

The retired bishop thought much dysfunction in the American United Methodist Church springs from a reluctance to choose the right side in national partisan struggles. The UMC “has been trying to straddle a widening political gulf and trying to have a foot on both sides of that gap, and it’s becoming extremely uncomfortable to hold that position.” The members and clergy of the ailing denomination have failed to condemn “capitalism with no limitations on it whatsoever,” “a philosophy of serial war,” and an “attitude of ecological contempt, which is dangerous to planet earth.” The speaker advised, “There is a need to re-evangelize Methodism to its prophetic witness.”

Storey concluded his crusade against any hint of otherworldliness. “I want to say the church is only the church when it’s engaging the world. All the rest is just preparation,” he revealed, to the potential chagrin of any contemplatives. “What would happen if our people decided to wrestle with the massive inequities that divide our world into ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots?” he asked, “What would happen if the church finally confessed that its longest standing disobedience to Jesus is its flirtation with war and the just war theory?” He also thought the issue of sanctuary flags needs “to be wrestled with.” “It is Caesar’s banner; it doesn’t belong in God’s house,” the activist leader urged. “Caesar will always push the boundaries of power. If they can, they will….We need to stop wrapping the church in red, white, and blue.” He also shared, “People are very concerned about removing God from the Pledge of Allegiance. I’m more concerned about whether the Pledge of Allegiance has removed God from many of our hearts.”

Finally, at the end of his evening presentation, Professor Storey hinted support for changes on United Methodist sexuality teaching, which currently disapproves of homosexual and other non-marital sex. Storey, on the other hand, complained, “All means all. It doesn’t mean some…It doesn’t mean if you look like me or love like me.” No doubt the radicals in the MFSA-friendly audience took this to mean agreement with their own very expansive attitude regarding sexual morality.  South African Methodism, especially the strand touted by its white leaders, is often more liberal than Christianity, including Methodism, in the rest of Africa.

United Methodist Bishop Melvin Talbert Backs Ecclesial Disobedience

Tags

, , ,

Bishop Melvin Talbert and Rev. Dr. Thomas W. Ogletree at the 2013 MIND lunch, posing for a photo op with Church of the Village icon Sparkles

(Photo credit:  MIND.)

(Here’s Andrew Harrod’s coverage of this event.)

By Jeffrey Baker of Pleasant Valley UMC in New York

The Methodists In New Directions (M.I.N.D.) Luncheon during the 2013 New York Annual Conference featured a talk by retired United Methodist Bishop Melvin Talbert.  In addition to speaking at this lunch, Bishop Talbert was also a guest during the Annual Conference Saturday morning Service of Ordination, Commissioning & Recognition.  During the June 7 lunch at Hofstra University a few words were also shared by retired Yale Divinity School Dean and ordained United Methodist Tom Ogletree, who faces charges for violating United Methodism’s prohibition on same-sex unions by marrying his son to another man.

Bishop Talbert spoke at length on the notion of justice and how individuals should respond to laws and rules they feel are unjust.  He used Ogletree as an example: “…[He] is a living example of biblical obedience.”  And he challenged us to consider if we will convict him as a church body using what many feel is an unjust and immoral law. Talbert recalled that while bishop of the California-Nevada Conference he investigated but did not prosecute 68 clergy who together conducted a same sex union in 1999.

Talbert suggested a few ways to think about this issue.  One way would be like John Wesley, who centered his ministry on “do[ing] the right thing.”  Citing Mark 12: 28-32, he said, “Wesley made it [doing the right thing] the focal point of his doctrine of Christian profession.”  Another approach is to refer to Micah 6, which summarizes the theological underpinnings of many issues where God asks us to support justice, mercy and walk humbly.  The final way to think about this that was presented was in the form of three simple rules: 1) Do no harm, 2) Do good and 3) Stay in love with God.

To give us some examples of these ideas, Talbert then presented a brief historical perspective of the world wide scope of today’s United Methodism.  This included what we do as a church in responding to global disasters as “the first to arrive and last to leave,” as well as our VIM (Volunteers in Mission) initiatives.  Some of the, “valley[s]” of past Methodism was also discussed including splits over slavery, segregation, and adding language in our Discipline against the homosexual practice.  Some history that would suggest that, “…particularly in the US, we are not a healthy church.”

Talbert brought the lunch audience to their feet by suggesting that some church rules are “…immoral and unjust and no longer deserve our loyalty and obedience.”  He reiterated that, if asked, he would perform a same sex marriage and feels at peace with himself and with God about it.  And he recounted a conversation he had with his granddaughter, who said the church is talking about her friends, and she feels these discussions do not welcome them. Talbert is concerned the church will loose her generation.

In conclusion, Talbert made three points:

1) Jesus had 12 faithful disciples and he was able to turn the world upside down so we should think about what we all can do as faithful disciples of Christ.

2) We have a dual allegiance at the moment to God and our church and he is hoping we all know how the priorities should be arranged and,

3) Even our church can be saved if it confesses its sin and he left by asking us to, “…do the right thing.”

The luncheon was concluded with a few words from Ogletree, who had “…provided a public witness for justice.”  He thanked the M.I.N.D. community for their support and the hundreds of well-wishers from whom he has heard.  Ogletree echoed Talbert in saying an “unjust law is no law.” Ogletree’s suggestion for moving forward is to get everyone to work together to change unjust rules.

Ogletree noted he is sometimes asked about leaving the United Methodist Church.  He said many people around the globe are shaped by Methodism and that if the church can recognize its disapproval of homosexual behavior as a mistake it will have broad influence on many societies.  He has also heard suggestions of a local option or “states rights” solution.  But he believes that as a global church, United Methodism should want to have a unified global solution.

Ogletree responded to the standing ovation by leading everyone in a verse of, “We Shall Overcome.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 547 other followers